Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Show Us Yours! > 7 porter progress, Engine build Number....seven?? ....now K1200

Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Ah, so the tables are actually summing then, I assumed that it switched from
cranking to afterstart to warmup.

I have had the after stat and warm up figures both set to past the top of the set up graphs.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

In the crank, afterstart settings you'll have a cranking threshold number, after the engine exceeds this number it will then be running on the ve table (+warmup enrichments). If it fires then stops the figures in the VE table need increasing.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Right, not fully knowing how MS sets up the injectors, i would say however you set it up to achieve, with the hardware you have, alternating pairs of injectors 1/4 and 2/3, firing twice per cycle with the correct calculated required fuel. Batch fire is too much for your injectors i feel.

The 490cc injectors are large enough for sequential injection, so are twice as large as they need to be on alternating and four times as large as they need to be on batch :/

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Matty, the MS uses the VE table differently to VEMS, the MS VE table has a noticable shape to it

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I'm running four off 490cc injectors on my 998 - no problems.

I ran them on the 1275 on the MS2/extra code two squirts per cycle. Ran OK.

I would stick with the MS settings you have and concentrate on the fuel delivery, ignition timing and other hardware.

It is easy to blame the ECU settings but it is usually something else as Matty found out.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

I'll get me coat

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Ms does a self calc when you change between 2&4 squirts and batch and alternating,

so if you enter the 4.6 req fuel calculated from the engine size, AFR and injector size it will have a box below that has the actual req fuel it is using (2.3)

the main reason i tried it on batch was i n case i hade the injectors connected up wrong , not that it should matter that much.

as you say the injector should be easily big enough, without increasing the fueling, with the figures i have entered i would have expected to flood the engine but have not really managed to.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

well I have ruled out the ignition, it should run on these settings if yours is, so that leaves fuel delivery.



On 7th Jul, 2008 Paul S said:
I'm running four off 490cc injectors on my 998 - no problems.

I ran them on the 1275 on the MS2/extra code two squirts per cycle. Ran OK.

I would stick with the MS settings you have and concentrate on the fuel delivery, ignition timing and other hardware.

It is easy to blame the ECU settings but it is usually something else as Matty found out.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Have you set the injector opening time?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury



On 7th Jul, 2008 mini13 said:


so if you enter the 4.6 req fuel calculated from the engine size, AFR and injector size it will have a box below that has the actual req fuel it is using (2.3)



By the sound of things MT is slightly different on MS to VEMS. If your req fuel is calculated to 4.6 and is actually set at 2.3 then the numbers in the VE table are effectively half what they should be aren't they (could be speaking betty swollocks though *laughing*)? Ive got my REq fuel set to 2.5 to give more fine adjustment as the calculated req fuel was 5.0!

Edited by matty on 7th Jul, 2008.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

It will only use the full 4.6ms on one squirt per cycle.

I guess that it is set up for two squirts per cycle and is running at 2.3ms

4.6 works out about right.

My money is on the injector opening time not being long enough.

With big injectors on a small engine, this is highly significant. If it is set too low then no fuel is going to get through.

It is worsened again by the halving of the Req Fuel.

At idle my pulse width is 1.3ms with all four injectors firing. That's 1ms to open and 0.3ms to deliver fuel. I actually have two of the injectors staged out to give a better idle.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Injector opening time is set to 1ms, as per the manual,

setings are as below.



Edited by Joe C on 8th Jul, 2008.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 8th Jul, 2008 mini13 said:
Injector opening time is set to 1ms, as per the manual,



I'm using 1ms for the Rover Mpi injectors but that may not be enough for the Pico injector.

EDIT: I cannot find anything to suggest that the Pico injector needs more than 1ms.

Edited by Paul S on 8th Jul, 2008.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Ummm. Thinking out load.

Noisy pump. Fluctuating pressure. Empty tank? *Idea*

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

me neither,


On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

Im running my 460's at 1ms at idle, haven't seen any problems yet?

Ive got some 230cc injectors you could try but one of them appears to but not working? *oh well*

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Matty I thougtt it was 2.4ms at idle?

and your other injectors are300 - 330cc *wink*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

well, borrowed another pump and jacked around with the opening time, to no avail, managed to flood it so cleared that out of the system with a minite of about 4000 rpm of blow torch powered flight,

also have poped the manifold of and pointed it up in the air and I am getting a good cranking spray, but of cource i cant check the afterstart pattern.

I assume the opening time has no effect on the cranking pattern.

currently have leveled the ve table entrys to 100 and put the req fuel to about 3 and am flooding it, am about to bolt the manifold back drop the ve table and crank up the req fuel.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

How long has the petrol been in the car?

If the car has been off the road since you started this thread, it could be nearly two years old.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

I would leave the VE table as it is and lower the Cold crank PW as you won't be running on the VE table until you have gone past the crank threshold setting (im guessing around 400RPM you have it set)?

What are your cold/warm PW's set to?

Edited by matty on 9th Jul, 2008.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

If it's been in the car since that's been off the road then we are talking more like 3 years eh Joe?

In the 13's at last!.. Just


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

more like 10.....

it has a can full of 2 month old stuff from the boot of my car and another can of fresh in it.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

What are your pulse widths whilst cranking?

Should be around 2-3ms.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

about 3.3 ms

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Is that with one or two squirts per cycle?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."

Home > Show Us Yours! > 7 porter progress, Engine build Number....seven?? ....now K1200
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: