| Page: |
| Home > Technical Chat > Turbo spool up - log manifold vs over the clutch | |||||||
|
25 Posts Member #: 11884 Member |
26th Apr, 2024 at 05:00:29pm
Has anyone got any direct experience of what spools up quicker, the fusion fans log manifold or the over the clutch one?
|
||||||
|
2488 Posts Member #: 1954 Post Whore Luton Bedfordshire |
27th Apr, 2024 at 09:56:10pm
The closer the turbo is to the head the less heat loss so better performance from the turbo. That's the theory. Own the day
|
||||||
 7265 Posts Member #: 1268 The Boom Boom speaker Police! Essex |
28th Apr, 2024 at 05:42:10am
I have had both a short manifold down the back and long over the clutch on my car with everything else being the same. Both were homemade rather than off the shelf.
In the 13's at last!.. Just |
||||||
|
3588 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
28th Apr, 2024 at 08:22:34am
On 26th Apr, 2024 NDT said:
Has anyone got any direct experience of what spools up quicker, the fusion fans log manifold or the over the clutch one? I mean same engine, same turbo. Really not as simple as one or the other. Manifold design, tube diameters etc etc. Although in the case of such a tight engine bay, I'd doubt there would be a huge difference either way, as space is limited, compared to picking the right turbocharger which will affect spool and overall performance. 9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
| Home > Technical Chat > Turbo spool up - log manifold vs over the clutch | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |