Page: |
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Mapping advise. Misfire | |||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
14th Sep, 2018 at 09:36:50pm
Evening all. Dont shoot me but I went and bought an Sc 5 port management kit. I'm mapping it on the road using my wideband and having success, great driveability compared to my carb and megajolt. My spec is 1293cc, Gt17' turbo, metro turbo inlet manifold opened up to 50mm to suit 50 mm SC throttle body, twin 660cc injectors, Delta Ecu. Audi TT intercooler.
|
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 12:49:32am
So 40 views not one comment i guess my car is too boring, and crap, this is turbominis 2018 dying on its arse i guess.....
Edited by dazibee on 16th Sep, 2018. |
||||||
1267 Posts Member #: 831 Post Whore Montreal, Canada |
16th Sep, 2018 at 01:36:43am
I think the main issue for not getting any reply is that not many people use the SC setup. And I'm not sure how many of them do their own tuning.
|
||||||
4890 Posts Member #: 1775 Post Whore Chester |
16th Sep, 2018 at 08:44:32am
I didn’t have much success with the SC setup. I kept blowing headgaskets, this was due to the timing moving about, we never found why, I would be driving along and suddenly the timing would drop to -2! Nothing in the map we could see was doing it.
Edited by gr4h4m on 16th Sep, 2018. I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
|
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 09:05:32am
Im fairly sure this setup runs 4 squirts per cycle.
|
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 09:08:04am
That gave me a decent idle, but it still wants to misfire 1500-2500 rpm only off load unless i richen it to 12:1 at these sites |
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
16th Sep, 2018 at 10:11:40am
Ive dabbled a little with the SC stuff on a K head motor, so not directly the same as not boosed so tps mapped, but I ran into a problem with timing at idle, and IIRC (its a few years back now) the issue was a setting related to the TPS that was fucking with the advance at idle. We got the car to SC and Simon sorted it in about 4 minutes and then mapped the motor.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
4890 Posts Member #: 1775 Post Whore Chester |
16th Sep, 2018 at 11:56:03am
Joe raises a good point. I’m guessing Simon would be money well spent.
I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
|
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 03:02:01pm
I have closed loop turned off. Idle is very steady so dont thing there is an air leak. Lambda has been calibrated and the readings seem consistent. When the misfire starts the afr swings from lean to rich snd lean to reach etc.
|
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
16th Sep, 2018 at 03:30:31pm
I’m just wondering if it’s just because you now can measure how rich it is that you are concerned. E.g was it always just as rich with the carb, but you just didn’t know?
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 04:21:11pm
When i used to make my own needles i could get the no load/1000-5000 rpm parts of the needle all to afr 13.8:1 without any probs. Same engine and everything,up until i converted to efi a few weeks ago. |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
16th Sep, 2018 at 04:37:28pm
On 16th Sep, 2018 dazibee said:
I have spoken to the rolling road operator SC use and he told me to richen up the low load parts of the map where the misfire occurs. I have done this, the misfire has gone but it seems silly to have 11.5 afr when you have fuel injection Why does a good idle at 11.5 seem "silly" - this is not a modern engine, even Vizard says they need to run rich at idle. (I won't go into the reasons why but they are fairly obvious when you consider the 60 year old engine design). Especially because of the charge robbing, and you are only reading the average AFR, not what's happening in the individual cylinders. Just set it to what's best for your individual engine at idle and then start to worry about what's happening under load. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgKJX13B1xE inners, outers and after turbo at idle (~850RPM) but ignore the after turbo reading at idle as, at the time I video'd this, I had a small air leak before the third sensor which is skewing the third reading lean. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
16th Sep, 2018 at 06:01:20pm
On 16th Sep, 2018 dazibee said:
When i used to make my own needles i could get the no load/1000-5000 rpm parts of the needle all to afr 13.8:1 without any probs. Same engine and everything,up until i converted to efi a few weeks ago. Yes, but the constant stream of air fuel mix from the SU is not the same as discreet injection periods. I think you are just finding the limitations of the setup.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
16th Sep, 2018 at 06:03:37pm
Also, you say that the vacuum is the same at idle as at your cruise/light load, but surely the throttle position isn’t the same. So surely you can set it differently to suit. If it needs 12:1 in a certain box to run nicely then thats just what it is.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 08:40:54pm
Yea rod and tom you are probably both right. After an su I'm probably expecting perfection. If I find there is nothing wrong with the sparks/ecu settings I will set it how the engine likes and go for it. On a plus note I've only been pissing around with it a bit but I already have amazing drive ability. 2:9 diff ten inch wheels, 2.5 first gear, I used to be stuck in first gear round my local hilly roads by the speed bumps Now I can use second or third. Getting there. Cheers |
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
16th Sep, 2018 at 08:47:48pm
On 16th Sep, 2018 Rod S said:
On 16th Sep, 2018 dazibee said:
I have spoken to the rolling road operator SC use and he told me to richen up the low load parts of the map where the misfire occurs. I have done this, the misfire has gone but it seems silly to have 11.5 afr when you have fuel injection Why does a good idle at 11.5 seem "silly" - this is not a modern engine, even Vizard says they need to run rich at idle. (I won't go into the reasons why but they are fairly obvious when you consider the 60 year old engine design). Especially because of the charge robbing, and you are only reading the average AFR, not what's happening in the individual cylinders. Just set it to what's best for your individual engine at idle and then start to worry about what's happening under load. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgKJX13B1xE inners, outers and after turbo at idle (~850RPM) but ignore the after turbo reading at idle as, at the time I video'd this, I had a small air leak before the third sensor which is skewing the third reading lean. |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Sep, 2018 at 09:22:45am
On 16th Sep, 2018 dazibee said:
I can set the idle mixture where I like it (13.8:1) same as an su. But no load sat stationary revving to 1.5,2.0, 3k is where it misfires. This is same part of map as deceleration around 30 mph Same applies as at idle if it's got no load on it. Whatever it runs best at which, with an A-series, is going to be somewhat rich when it's unloaded. I'm not sure what the two axes are on the SC "maps" but at no load you are going to be in cells that represent fairly high vacuum whatever the RPM element of the cells are. Just set those cells to where it idles (or fast idles) best, or at least acceptably if you want to try and keep it as lean as possible. It is quite probable that your misfire when you try to aim for 14.7 is just the outer two cylinders. Re-reading your initial post, two 660cc injectors is very large for a throttle body setup which means the pulse width is going to be very small at no load (whether that is idle, 2k, 3k, whatever, no load equals little fuel) so at 4 squirts per cycle it is going to be 4 very short duration slugs of fuel being shot into the inlet manifold. As Jean and Tom have said, that is very different to a continuous atomised stream the SU gives. And because the SC setup (and any other "wet manifold" setup) cannot target the individual cylinders you will get charge robbing and charge robbing is likely to be worse the shorter the pulse width is because it will have less time to atomise at it leaves the injector nozzle so the fuel vs air acceleration down the ports is potentially going to be worse along with wall wetting and all the other siamese anomalies. The important bits to get right are the cells which equate to high load and esp. high load and high RPM (to protect the engine) and then cruise - which is where there is some load on the engine, different to what you are talking about at the moment - if you want fuel economy. EDIT - typo Edited by Rod S on 17th Sep, 2018. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
17th Sep, 2018 at 11:16:57am
On 17th Sep, 2018 Rod S said:
On 16th Sep, 2018 dazibee said:
I can set the idle mixture where I like it (13.8:1) same as an su. But no load sat stationary revving to 1.5,2.0, 3k is where it misfires. This is same part of map as deceleration around 30 mph Same applies as at idle if it's got no load on it. Whatever it runs best at which, with an A-series, is going to be somewhat rich when it's unloaded. I'm not sure what the two axes are on the SC "maps" but at no load you are going to be in cells that represent fairly high vacuum whatever the RPM element of the cells are. Just set those cells to where it idles (or fast idles) best, or at least acceptably if you want to try and keep it as lean as possible. It is quite probable that your misfire when you try to aim for 14.7 is just the outer two cylinders. Re-reading your initial post, two 660cc injectors is very large for a throttle body setup which means the pulse width is going to be very small at no load (whether that is idle, 2k, 3k, whatever, no load equals little fuel) so at 4 squirts per cycle it is going to be 4 very short duration slugs of fuel being shot into the inlet manifold. As Jean and Tom have said, that is very different to a continuous atomised stream the SU gives. And because the SC setup (and any other "wet manifold" setup) cannot target the individual cylinders you will get charge robbing and charge robbing is likely to be worse the shorter the pulse width is because it will have less time to atomise at it leaves the injector nozzle so the fuel vs air acceleration down the ports is potentially going to be worse along with wall wetting and all the other siamese anomalies. The important bits to get right are the cells which equate to high load and esp. high load and high RPM (to protect the engine) and then cruise - which is where there is some load on the engine, different to what you are talking about at the moment - if you want fuel economy. EDIT - typo |
||||||
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
17th Sep, 2018 at 11:57:38am
All in all it would appear to be an engine/general arrangement issue rather than an ECU issue.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
553 Posts Member #: 1356 Post Whore TRURO, CORNWALL |
18th Sep, 2018 at 09:01:05pm
Ok guys thanks for the input. I will put it back together over next few days and try a few ideas |
||||||
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Mapping advise. Misfire | |||||||
|
Page: |