Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Show Us Yours! > Homemade milling machine well kinda.. Connecting rods 998 and 1098

Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

for my 1098 based turbo build would like to see 150-160 so bring on the boost

well as above i have made a jig to lose some weight on my rods i think its done a cracking job but now i think about it i may have gone a bit to skinny?

im i right to think 95% of the forces on the small end are pushing down the beam so its quite safe to go this thin on top? is it only the weight of the piston getting puled down ie drag from the rings and piston that will have an effect on the rod as boost while the intake is open will be pushing the piston down on the intake stroke well most of it?

EDIT: some scales are on their way also the size from the bush/pin surface to the outer edge is 0.130" and the wall is 0.055"-0.060"

pics as we all like them.. tell me what you guys think good or bad hell id rather get abused at this stage than have the rods exit the block!

this rod is a trial and it dose really matter to much but its always a bummer to destroy a good part !





Edited by Turbo This.. on 14th Sep, 2012.


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

Bin them! Sorry.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane




On 14th Sep, 2012 Vegard said:
Bin them! Sorry.


anything else to add?


mercenary62

User Avatar

641 Posts
Member #: 9937
Post Whore

somewhereintheuniverse near selkirk scotland

skip time sorry mate there no good

give em hell


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

ok so i have done wrong buy what?

i cant do a good set if i don't know what or how ive done wrong come on guys this is about helping and teaching

is it just to thin? if so its easy to slide the cutter into the chuck some more and that will take less off.. (i guess what i should have done to start with..??)
is a burr no good for removing material?



TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

A novel way to remove material and be consistent across all the rods...
It does look a little thin, but it isn't thin all the way across, so maybe it will be ok?
I know I wouldn't have risked removing that much - but I don't know if the 1098 rods are weak or will stand some tweaking... See what others say for sure.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

thanks dave

yeah i think ill take far less of the rods for the build basically just enough to get a constant thickness all the way around


adcyork

User Avatar

539 Posts
Member #: 6807
Post Whore

York

inertia forces as the piston mass is accelerated back down the bore is the time of peak stress on the rod. Taking meat of the little end like you have would be the last place I'd look at.

Ask yourself this: Without the necessary test equipment to validate the strength of the modified rods, is it really worth the risk when it will most likely cause a substantial amount of damage if that lets go?


adcyork

User Avatar

539 Posts
Member #: 6807
Post Whore

York

inertia forces as the piston mass is accelerated back down the bore is the time of peak stress on the rod. Taking meat of the little end like you have would be the last place I'd look at.

Ask yourself this: Without the necessary test equipment to validate the strength of the modified rods, is it really worth the risk when it will most likely cause a substantial amount of damage if that lets go?


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

adcyork what you have said makes a lot of sense
a lighter piston would stress the rod less thus making rod modifications less drastic on rod strength but as you say do to much and things can quickly go very badly

im sure there is a margin for error in the factory casting so surely taking the casting back to a more uniform shape shouldn't hurt it that much? provided the lowest point is not past the point of strength witch is waht your saying i just dont know if its to far to cause damage or not

anyone have some idea's on testing them?


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

I too like what you have made but the little end is the last place i would remove material looks neat though

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Just keep it :) have it on your shelf! haha I got a 850 Con rod with a piston stuck to it as a candle holder.

and just too add 1098 and 998 Con rods are the same its just different piston gunen pin holes heights are a little bit different


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

Sorry to add. .. but a would throw them in the hedges. ..... not worth the risk,

For forced induction use as the engine doesn't. Use high RPMs

IMO use standard rods with ARP bolts
With lightened. Rods you may get 6" more over the quarter mile






Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

Only really one way to find out.... Really depends on if you like engine building. Without FEA and CAD simulations the only way to find out is to try it. People told me that a std crank was only good for 150 bhp. I've been using the same star crank for over 10 years over 150 bhp, and now over 250 bhp. If something never breaks is it over engineered?

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


pieter

User Avatar

239 Posts
Member #: 7577
Senior Member

belgium

conrods make good car prizes




and used pistons are very useful as ashtrays in the workplace if you are a smoker


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 15th Sep, 2012 Jimster said:
Only really one way to find out.... Really depends on if you like engine building. Without FEA and CAD simulations the only way to find out is to try it. People told me that a std crank was only good for 150 bhp. I've been using the same star crank for over 10 years over 150 bhp, and now over 250 bhp. If something never breaks is it over engineered?


wot he said ^^^^

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

This is what the professional engine builders do for Mini 7s:


Edited by Paul S on 15th Sep, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


topcat

318 Posts
Member #: 9408
Senior Member

Tiptree, Essex

Nice effort, but yeah- the small end takes a fair bit of stress when the piston gets to the top of the stroke it wants to carry on hurtling upwards, the rod has to hang on to it and pull it down. I recall hearing that a big % of conrod failures are because they stretch at the top of the stroke and let the piston make contact with the head/valves.

IMO weight off the small end is a good thing as it is purely changing direction (up-down-up etc) which takes a lot of energy to do. The big end is just rotating with the crank so there is only a constant directional change. I'd do them again but take less off, if you're happy to experiment with your engine that is.

Only my opinion of course!

TC

www.topcatcustom.co.uk


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

personally I'd give them a shot in a 998, but in a 1098 with the linger stroke I think it may be a bit risky.

10/10 for enginuity though, that jig has made a nice job of them.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans


[quote=Turbo This..,14th Sep, 2012]
im i right to think 95% of the forces on the small end are pushing down the beam so its quite safe to go this thin on top? is it only the weight of the piston getting puled down ie drag from the rings and piston that will have an effect on the rod as boost while the intake is open will be pushing the piston down on the intake stroke well most of it?
/quote]

The forces at TDC are the highest .

for a 3.2 stroke and 8k rpm:
Maximum TDC Rod Tension GForce= 3720,62 G's
Maximum BDC Rod Compression GForce= 2099,97 G's

Pretty serious loadings. and the 1100 used an even longer stroke so ..

What material is that rod made of ? they downgraded the material a few times as the rod was bulky enough to get away with it. So if it is an early rod it might work... I would have clenched buttock syndrome all the time, so not for me. IF it lets go, the engine is trash. Can you, and are you willing to afford it ?

Iīd say : why do this machining in the first place ( i like the method btw !), for a turbo you donīt need it and for a super high rpm engine i would not trust it.

Edited by Sir Yun on 15th Sep, 2012.

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


mcalvert39

388 Posts
Member #: 442
Senior Member

Manchester

Stick em in a donor scrap block and run it up on a test rig. And stay well back. Maybe behind a blast shield. Good effort though!


TurboTom

248 Posts
Member #: 7936
Senior Member

DK-8450 Hammel. Denmark

What i learned school is:
What kills a conrod is when you close the butterflyvalve. The conrod can take a massive beating at full throtle, but when you close the butterfly, you create a vacuum above the piston, making the rod break.
I have made several sets lighter with the help of the yellow bible from uncle David. i took out approx 120 gram.(No idea what it is in pounds) *smiley*

It did take a lot of time and today i wouldnīt do it.

P.S. They did hold in a overbored 1098 @ +7500 rpm.

If i have more toys than you when i die, I WIN


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

what do the rods weigh as standard? mine are down to 499g each (1275 A+) but my little end is only lightened enough to remove the casting marks then a good polish


Attachments:

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

i do have two spare blocks so i could run them up to speed it would be a bit of messing around as i dont have all the parts to put in the firing line but worth it i think

i have started a different set ive taken just enough off it this time to get a constant radius well 6 different angles really but once i ran the flap wheel over it its blended nicely

this is where im wel ill go do some work on one and take some pics so far i plan to finish the small ends and polish them all up then take them to have the big ends spun then ill finish polish them like brett has

think a stock rod is 660g ? or is that a 1275? my scales are on there way


topcat

318 Posts
Member #: 9408
Senior Member

Tiptree, Essex

Brett how did you polish them up that well?!

www.topcatcustom.co.uk

Home > Show Us Yours! > Homemade milling machine well kinda.. Connecting rods 998 and 1098
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: