Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Canems ECU 1380 N/A

ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member

For anybody who is searching for info on the Canems ECU , I know there isnt much as I have been searching for ages! but I have one now so I suppose it would be a good Idea to share what I have.

Bare in mind that this engine is currently running on the base maps on the ECU, it will be set up on a RR in the future as the engine beds in.

Engine:

1380 A+
286 Cam
1.3:1 Rockers
Maniflow LCB exhaust manifold and system.
Bosch Wideband Lambda sensors mounted on exhaust manifolds, one on centre branch other on the straight part of the Y.

Lambda 1 for AFR1 is on the Centre Branch
Lambda 2 for AFR2 is on the Y part.

Fuel system:

MPI tank
MPI fuel Rail
x2 34mm Mikuni TB,
Delphi 500cc Fuel Injectors

Now onto the Base Maps :

Ignition:


Fuelling:




Data logging showing AFR:


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member

Heres a AFR from a 15min run today, as the map above was indicating a very lean mixture on the inner cylinders:



I think its worth noting the time on the X axis, the Data logger either doesnt allow you to view the entire drive, it is graduated every 10 secs, which is a PITA. Ill try to find if I can change the scale.

Would the position of the Lambda2 on the straight part of the Y affect the readings as its getting both exhausts from 1 and 4 combining here?


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

Is the scale 10-20 for the afrs? Still look quite far apart.

Edit: also how are you finding the mikunis? I'll most likely be running them on my na engine

Edited by sturgeo on 29th Jun, 2011.


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

Looks like you getting to grips with it anyway ciaran Well done great to se somone trying somthing different :)

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

What can you adjust on the Canems ECU to equalize the AFRs? Is it still a semi-sequential injection scheme (Marcel's original method)? Does it use the MPi cam sensor signal?

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

that is very lean, looks too much for just port robbing to me,

I'd be looking for air leaks upstream of the lambda, and try swaping them over as a double check.

also theres room for a shed load more advance at cruise, that map looks like its just emulating a dizzy curve , i'd increase it by 10 deg at cruise straigt away.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

As far as I'm aware it doesn't use a cam signal but it does have a injection timing table.

Ciaran, can you post up a screenshot of that please? Might be able to give you a few pointers to get your afrs closer until you get it on the RR


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

Does the canems include 2 wideband controllers or are they external units? Might also be worth checking the calibration on them.


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:
As far as I'm aware it doesn't use a cam signal but it does have a injection timing table.

Yeah but with a semi-sequential, you can only lean out the outer cylinders by injecting outside the window. And the outer cylinders are the ones that have a tendency to be leaner in the first place.

The fact that the inner cylinders are leaner here can only indicate a problem. Either the sensors are not reading correctly or there is a miscalibration. One reason for a bad reading could be an air leak which would read lean. A misfire would also read lean.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

This all started here http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...tid=428107&fr=0

Air leaks basically.....

But even if the air leaks are fixed, the readings on the two widebands are just too far apart for it to be running well.

And as Jean says, we all expect the outers to be lean, not the inners.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member

Right Im just back from another run, I can clear up a few things:

1. Yes there is a airleak, its a fair bit down stream of the lambda at the Joint between the manifold and the exhaust.

2. The wideband sensors are built into the software.

I decided instead of using the standard display to just swith it to just showing the AFR, this is interesting.

Under load the AFR gets leaner on both, it begins to richen up as it idles for example at traffic lights, I set the outer wideband to be the sensor to dictate the feedback, which instead of refrencing the AFR map for its info, ive set it a target of 13.4 , which I think isnt OTT on either rich or lean, and from what Ive read the older engines prefer slightly rich.

back to the AFR guages, as soon as you accelerate, the AFR on 2 and 3 shoots straight to 20, now its probably more as this is the max on the guage, it stays here under cruise and load, then drops during Idle. Interestingly the outer one hovers in and around the 13.4 , Ill try swap to the sensor on the centre branch to see if that improves matters.

Its worth keeping in mind that these are base maps, and Im learning from nothing as Ive no previous experience other than a few labs on control sys in college.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:
Is the scale 10-20 for the afrs? Still look quite far apart.

Edit: also how are you finding the mikunis? I'll most likely be running them on my na engine


Ive no Idea what the scale is TBH, on the guages its calibrated 10 - 20 in steps of 2.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 PaulH said:
Looks like you getting to grips with it anyway ciaran Well done great to se somone trying somthing different :)


Cheers paul, I wouldnt say getting to grips with it just yet, but I am beginning to get my head around all the different figures and what they mean. The books I researched were just basic and didnt touch much on the issue of charge robbing at all!

Ill be getting it RR in a month when its all run in and Ive funds, do you know how much it does cost to get it done in westward? I got quoted e350 in TDP.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 jbelanger said:
What can you adjust on the Canems ECU to equalize the AFRs? Is it still a semi-sequential injection scheme (Marcel's original method)? Does it use the MPi cam sensor signal?

Jean


It doesnt use any cam sensor, AFAIK its to do with the ignition timing, I cant find out much as its got a Patent pending on it, Im not sure of the number but I have it in my thesis, Ill dig it out tomorrow.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 Joe C said:
that is very lean, looks too much for just port robbing to me,

I'd be looking for air leaks upstream of the lambda, and try swaping them over as a double check.

also theres room for a shed load more advance at cruise, that map looks like its just emulating a dizzy curve , i'd increase it by 10 deg at cruise straigt away.



If I want to swap them I have to take out the entire manifold, me being in a rush, I guessed where to mount them on the exhaust before I fitted the engine,and while they fit in just about, the entire manifold will have to come up as the one on the centre branch just clears the bulkehead by a few cm.

sorry for my ignorance, Im just learning, but by increasing at cruise do you mean at low load?


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:
As far as I'm aware it doesn't use a cam signal but it does have a injection timing table.

Ciaran, can you post up a screenshot of that please? Might be able to give you a few pointers to get your afrs closer until you get it on the RR



Injection Timing


I presume this is in degrees of crank rotation?


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member

Im going to pull the plugs out as that will give an idea of whats going on and will discount a sensor or air leak issue.


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

On 29th Jun, 2011 ciaran said:
It doesnt use any cam sensor, AFAIK its to do with the ignition timing, I cant find out much as its got a Patent pending on it, Im not sure of the number but I have it in my thesis, Ill dig it out tomorrow.

Actually, a patent makes it completely public. It just means you can't use the knowledge to make money on it without the agreement of the patent holder. And the Canems patent, at least the one I've seen references to, is actually taking what Marcel Chichak wrote many years ago on his web site so I don't see how this could be enforced but I may be wrong.

In any case, it's quite simple (once you've figured it out) and simply fires an injector once per rev on each intake port using the same timing and pulse width. So while this is very simple to implement and does not require a cam sensor, it also can't deal with the different fuel requirements for the inner and outer cylinders. And the requirements are significantly different as Paul has shown in his initial tests.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:

Edit: also how are you finding the mikunis? I'll most likely be running them on my na engine



the mikunis are good, I took awhile to get the engine Idling right as I had a few air leaks, but I sorted them, The best thing about them so far is the noise, its unreal.

I cant really comment about their performance till I let the engine have so high revs. I worked out that they were sufficient to flow enough air. However, I was told to go abit higher in the diameter, but I decided to stick with my calculations.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member


On 29th Jun, 2011 jbelanger said:
Actually, a patent makes it completely public. It just means you can't use the knowledge to make money on it without the agreement of the patent holder. And the Canems patent, at least the one I've seen references to, is actually taking what Marcel Chichak wrote many years ago on his web site so I don't see how this could be enforced but I may be wrong.


Thats what I was thinking but I couldnt find anything on it patentwise, I did find the patent for the MPI solution, I have it in PDF if anybody wants to read it.


On 29th Jun, 2011 jbelanger said:
In any case, it's quite simple (once you've figured it out) and simply fires an injector once per rev on each intake port using the same timing and pulse width. So while this is very simple to implement and does not require a cam sensor, it also can't deal with the different fuel requirements for the inner and outer cylinders. And the requirements are significantly different as Paul has shown in his initial tests.


So, it would be very difficult or impossible to for the approach canems use to eliminate charge robbing? or even reduce it? Their claims are fairly impressive to be honest.


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

If you haven't already, have a good read of this: http://www.canems.co.uk/siameseports.php

Ideally you'll want a rolling road that will let you play with your injection timing, most operators only do ignition and ve tables.

Seems odd that the numbers appear to be grayed out on the table you posted, I might try and get hold of the software and have a look at it.


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

I personally believe that the canems system can be made to work better than a carb. We personally didn't have much luck with this method but with time working on your injection timing table and on a RR at various rpm/load sites you should be able to do a better job. It'll be better than any wet manifold setup which are about as good as pissing into the wind.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:
If you haven't already, have a good read of this: http://www.canems.co.uk/siameseports.php

Ideally you'll want a rolling road that will let you play with your injection timing, most operators only do ignition and ve tables.

Seems odd that the numbers appear to be grayed out on the table you posted, I might try and get hold of the software and have a look at it.


Yea you can only change the timing at no load which is odd.


ciaran

96 Posts
Member #: 7325
Advanced Member




On 29th Jun, 2011 sturgeo said:
I personally believe that the canems system can be made to work better than a carb. We personally didn't have much luck with this method but with time working on your injection timing table and on a RR at various rpm/load sites you should be able to do a better job. It'll be better than any wet manifold setup which are about as good as pissing into the wind.


Its semi wet if that makes any sense! the manifold is small but the injectore are upstream, its maybe 10cm from injector to valve.


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

http://www.canems.co.uk/pdf/injection_manual.pdf

Check out page 46, all of the cells are editable. Might be worth giving canems a call and making sure you have the right firmware etc installed for the Siamese ports.

Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Canems ECU 1380 N/A
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: