Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Paul S trials and testing > Yet Another Rolling Road Log

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Plots from the RR sessions at Smart Performance yesterday:

The RR printout:


Odd behavour on the third run, so we aborted. It is not clear at this moment in time if these are flywheel or wheel powers as we did not complete the coast down run.

Run 1:


Hit the rev limiter hard and a nive big bang out of the exhaust *happy*
A little bit of AE spiking to sort out.


Run 2:

Looks OK


Run 3:

Nothing untoward except that the boost did not build as quick, but note how the revs rise twice as fast. I think that Chris must have halved the resistance on that run.

I've plotted the flywheel power, based on the assumption that the above are wheel powers and we are getting the target 120hp. I'll wait for the confirmation before posting the new curves.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Funnily enough Paul, Garry had something similar on one of his runs, inexplicably he couldn't get the motor to make boost, as if it wasn't loaded enough.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

I thought I'd forgotten to tighten a clamp in the rush to put it back together, but it was fine on the road both there and back.

Robert mentioned something about the resistance/speed of the rollers affecting boost?

In the 13's at last!.. Just


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

I must say although from a couple of cars, mine included, the numbers seemed credible, it did seem to be quite a low resistance and hence high acceleration rate that was being used for the sweep tests.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The T2 does take time to spool up, so if I'm pushing it in 1st, then I will not see boost until 5000 rpm. By the time I get to top gear it is usually all in by 4000rpm.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Well, Chris has confirmed that we did not do the coast down run, so here is the flywheel power curve using the losses from the NMS rolling road. I think that we should take the Run 3 data with a pinch of salt for now.



*happy**happy**happy**happy**happy*

It also at 11.6 psi boost, so I'm well pleased.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

good stuff!

That torque curves not very flat though is it! *tongue*

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

That could still be down to running too rich. Looking at the datalogs from last years RR days (flatish torque curve) we were running leaner and steadier afr's. Since we've fitted the new FPR we need to do a little more fine tuning.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 3rd Oct, 2010 Joe C said:
That torque curves not very flat though is it! *tongue*


Ha ha,

I'm just the same as everyone else now. As Sturgeo says, some of it could be due to the fueling settings, but I'm more inclined to think that the crap FPR was not working right on last years runs.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

I notice afr2 stays pretty flat and afr 1 goes slighty richer at the top end

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 3rd Oct, 2010 Joe C said:
I notice afr2 stays pretty flat and afr 1 goes slighty richer at the top end


Yes, but the main thing is that we are getting enough fuel into the outer cylinders (AFR2 - red trace). That's the holy grail in siamese code terms.

We should be able to lean out the inners (AFR - green trace)by reducing the VE and knocking a bit of the injection timing.

We were in half a mind to sort that out yesterday, but things didn't go our way.

Edited by Paul S on 3rd Oct, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

ah so afr 2 is the outers then?



On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 3rd Oct, 2010 Joe C said:
ah so afr 2 is the outers then?


I hope so.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

LOL

well its certainly doing the do!

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Well, it seems to be doing incredably well.

I've just calculated the SOT figure and fell of my chair.

Must wait until our psycho-analyst has sorted out the unsmoothed numbers before publishing.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

paul ,can you do an overlay of your previous best power graph from nm ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 4th Oct, 2010 robert said:
paul ,can you do an overlay of your previous best power graph from nm ?


Yes.



The only change has been the FPR. It certainly feels a lot quicker with the new FPR.

I've had to reduce the fueling map at boost quite a bit with the new regulator which makes think that the old one was not correctly referencing boost. That would have also affected the atomisation due to a low rail pressure.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

blimey that was quick ! now can you do a boost overlay for the two runs ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 4th Oct, 2010 robert said:
blimey that was quick ! now can you do a boost overlay for the two runs ?


It's a good job that I've got staff to do the work for me these days :)

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

This makes me even mor sceptical on my torque figures of 140ftlb. I'll stick my graph up later.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph

www.twin-turbo.co.uk

On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Boost data added.

This is taken from the MS logs as it was not available elsewhere.



Spooling at a different rate, but the NMS RR did have a lot more resistance.

Let me know when you are ready for the SOT curve!

Edited by Paul S on 4th Oct, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

Do you want MAT's and AFR's as well Robert?


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 4th Oct, 2010 sturgeo said:
Do you want MAT's and AFR's as well Robert?


Don't encourage him.

Before you ask, MATs were actually within about 2 to 3 degrees on those two runs. Average AFRs were very similar.

Not sure why we did not get higher torque at the lower end of the rev range at NMS, but it's the bit between 4500 to 6000 rpm that I'm interested in.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Just a note about our rollers that might help you.

The power runs are done via an inertia test. I.e. no load was applied to the rollers. The resistance is just the rollers weight.

So the load was definitely not changed from one run to the other.

Maybe the engines revved up to quickly to produce the best boost?

Chris


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Thanks Chris.

Here are the two MV logs from NMS and Run 2:

NMS - 112hp run


SP - Run 2

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."

Home > Paul S trials and testing > Yet Another Rolling Road Log
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: