Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Is structual strength significantly compromised by a bulkhead box?

minimole23

4307 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

By cutting a large chunk of box section away to make way for the t3, is the shell stiffness reduced by a significant amount? Also in an accident, will the bulkhead will just fold?

I'm at the initial planning stage of mine which I might turbo next summer. I can't afford aftermarket manifolds, t2 ect so the bulkhead box is my only way forward.

Just after opions on the matter really.

Cheers

Edited by minimole23 on 11th Jan, 2008.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

Of course it is. How much however is hard to say. Many use rollcages in their trackday warriors, these obviously rectify this + more.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

i think in a crash the bulkhead is gonna be the last of the problems...but i think the box's are made with thicker metal anyway so there'd be no real big strength lost...maybe lol
Moz

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


richminiturbo.

User Avatar

2370 Posts
Member #: 719
Post Whore

Horndean - Near Portsmouth

The cross member which the bulkhead box replaces part of is box section which is the strenghening for the bulkhead itself, when you fit the bulkhead box its concave on relation to this and youve obvioulsy removed the barcing box section that was there before so yeah it will definately be weaker!

The only way to reduce the rigidity lost by putting the bulkhead box in is to use really thick sheeting and combined with decent weld I dont think theres much else you can do!

With a steel front end though, surely a fairly hefty whack will in theory bend the subframe upwards? And not push it back towards the bulkhead? Ive got a flipfront, obviously wont take as big a hit so I might be having the engine as a passenger if I stack it badly lol!

Rich

Edited by richminiturbo. on 30th Oct, 2007.


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

i would say the bulkhead must be weaker even with a seam welded box and the subframe bracing kit.

BUT i've had a couple of turbo minis over the last 12 to 14years, and ive never had a bulkhead or subframe crack. the first turbo mini had the box section removed but the bulkhead intact and no subby bracing, then it got a seam welded bulkhead box and that was fine.

how they fair in a crash? i hope not to find out!


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

in mine , i have welded captive nuts on the subframe in 4 places along the engine side at the top ,then packed the space between the frame and the body with plates of steel ,then put a plate inside the car and bolted the whole thing ,plate, body, packing ,and sub ,all together in the 4 places with m8 ht bolts ,this prob makes it all a bit more rigid ,you could try that if your worried ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

I've done a similar thing to Robert, with a packer and 3 off M10 HT capheads.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


andywaller

User Avatar

646 Posts
Member #: 1826
Post Whore

Maldon Essex

i can say that they definatley do weaken the structure, i have cut out my upper bulkhead as im fitting a large air box, with the lower bulkhead in one piece it was fine, but once cut out and the turbo box re welded (seam welded) in there is definate flex there.

its something im hoping with my cage and some bracing in the upper baulkhead i will be able to loose.






redwing

User Avatar

214 Posts
Member #: 1574
Senior Member

Malta

Well this is how I did mine and I dont think it'll be any worse than it was before the mod. Certainly worth spending a bit of time to get right.


Attachments:


It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt... Then it's hilarious!


redwing

User Avatar

214 Posts
Member #: 1574
Senior Member

Malta

Well this is how I did mine and I dont think it'll be any worse than it was before the mod. Certainly worth spending a bit of time to get right.


Attachments:


It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt... Then it's hilarious!


stevieturbo

3591 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

I would say that yes it does weaken it...

But, dont forget. You also have the shell tied together by that strong steel structure that is the front subrame, bolted at either side of the bulkhead box.
Get some solid or poly mounts for it, and it should remain pretty strong in there.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


minimole23

4307 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

I have done some reasoning, and decided that as most turbo minis have them welded in so I will stop worrying and get on and chop the bulkhead when the time comes.

cheers.

Edited by minimole23 on 31st Oct, 2007.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

PS- There is only one "a" in "bulkhead" :)


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

Removing that much of the crossmember will reduce its rigidity by at least 50% or more - that is torsional rigidity, for compressive strength it would be reduced by a far greater percentage - probably 80% or so. No matter how thick a gauge of metal you weld back in you will never regain the rigidity in this method - if you want to regain the strength you need to add section - box, tube etc across the dash rail area at least with large spreader plates tied into the crossmember at its ends and in the middle, to reform a "section" for the forces to react against.

wether this section of the mini was way over engineered in 59 I don't know, hence why it may not make a diffrence. If you were to do a torsional rigidity check on the mini shell with and without this section removed I think it would raise a few eyebrows as to how much the rgidity has changed

just my two penoths worth from a qualified chassis design engineer!

JK

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Mirage

538 Posts
Member #: 119
Post Whore

Staffordshire or Northamptonshire

Taking out the box section from the bulkhead lowers its strength end of. It dosen't matter how you weld in yor box. You have replaced a box section with a pan type structure.


Bat

User Avatar

4559 Posts
Member #: 786
Post Whore

Bermingum

Hi,
A Mini involved in any serious acccident folds up to look like an explosion in an origami factory.
If you get hit side on the sills are more of a worry.
Full cage would be the only way to maximise your chances of staying intact!
Cheers,
Gavin :)

VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!

WB/EGT gauges. Click here for customers write-up

Visit www.doyouneedabrain.co.uk

My Mini build diary


minimole23

4307 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire

Well thats cleared that up well.

What i'll do is weld the box in, mabie with some sort of bracing behind it, then do as per Robert mentioned and tie it in to the bulkhead.

Thanks all.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

my idea to being back regidity was to make almost a strutbrace from each of big bolts at the top of the subframe wich if im not mistaken are part of the suspention. i was going to have a brace going from each of the mounts back into the car and then accros the back then bolted to the bulkhead box. no idea if this would work but im going to give it a go

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Is structual strength significantly compromised by a bulkhead box?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: