Page: |
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Megasquirt Traction Control | |||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
20th Feb, 2010 at 08:44:44pm
dug these out of the bin of wonders...are they viable ?
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
20th Feb, 2010 at 11:09:24pm
If I've read the number right from the photo (285-829) they are discontinued and are proximity switches rather than hall effect, their current replacement (249-2237) has a maximum frequency of only 800 Hz.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
20th Feb, 2010 at 11:12:44pm
On 20th Feb, 2010 Rob H said:
I even dusted off my old copy of "Operational Amplifiers with Linear Integrated Circuits" and promptly realised why I haven't touched it in over 10 years. I have the same feeling occasionally, except I would probably say 20 years..... I'll have a read of that other link on the print/etch paper tomorrow. EDIT - just thought, if you used a diode to backfeed the input vs the supply rail (which I assume you used at 5V as the reference voltage) surely that would explain an ~0.7V difference ??? Edited by Rod S on 20th Feb, 2010. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
21st Feb, 2010 at 07:52:09am
thanks rod ,worth a try ! Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
21st Feb, 2010 at 08:29:16am
Actually, looking back at Paul's calculations he gets 430Hz with a 12 tooth wheel so it's within their range if they are the same specification as the replacement items that RS lists.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
21st Feb, 2010 at 12:18:49pm
Just ordered my parts from Farnell.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 12:54:03pm
I've just tested my Hall switches against the trigger wheel in the lathe. They are not as gap tolerant as I would like.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 01:17:30pm
On 21st Feb, 2010 Rod S said:
Just ordered my parts from Farnell. Enough to do a 4 channel system with maximum from the rear and maximum or average from the front. I've gone about it in a different way, I'm hoping to be able to fit the ABS trigger wheels I mentioned earlier to both the pot joints and inside the rear hubs, they are 42 teeth so will have a much higher resolution at low speeds anyway and found some miniature Hall switches which are optimised for the finer teeth on an ABS wheel. They are not in a nice neat package but just a plain chip designed for the automotive industry to install in their own packages so I'll have to improvise with some epoxy but a lot cheaper and a lot smaller than Paul's choice. With the higher resolution wheels I may not limit the voltage range to low speeds only but I've still ordered some OpAmps to use as voltage protection on the CPU and give me the option of high or low speed, might even make it switchable.... Can you share the circuit for the rear wheels Rod? I can from the datasheet see how you get the Vout from the circuit for the maximum configuration. It's the resistors and capacitors after that point that I'm not sure of. I'm happy with a single sensor on the front wheels with the ATB LSD, but I can see that other than going in a straight line the single rear wheel system will have it's limitations. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
21st Feb, 2010 at 01:55:33pm
On 21st Feb, 2010 Paul S said:
Can you share the circuit for the rear wheels Rod? I can from the datasheet see how you get the Vout from the circuit for the maximum configuration. It's the resistors and capacitors after that point that I'm not sure of. I haven't drawn it out yet but basically on the circuit TL/H/7942-35 on the datasheet, first the two outputs are from pin 5 on the 14 pin chip, not pin 4 as they show because they are showing the 8 pin example.... you add the 10K resistor to ground (bottom left of diagram) and the bit in the bottom right that just represents the output voltage, feed it to the MS through a 1k resistor with a 220nF capacitor to ground before the resistor and a 10nF one to ground after the resistor. If you look at Patrick's figure 8 you will see that replicates the output from pin 5 on a single 14 pin LM2917. The 1k resistor is to limit current to the MS2 CPU and the 10k to make sure the LM2917 output is true zero when stationary without drawing too much current. The capacitors are for decoupling and ideally the 220nF one would be mounted near the LM2917 chip and the 10nF one close to the MS2 CPU, ie, if there is room, put the 1k resistor and 10nF capacitor inside the MS2 box. Hope that makes sense :) As I'll be adding a couple of extra bits (the OpAmps as voltage protection if I chose to run this at low speeds only) I won't draw it out until I have proven the voltage protection works. On 21st Feb, 2010 Paul S said: Yes, was it Wil or Ben who mentioned it in the earlier thread about the hillclimber lifting an inside rear wheel - I think even on a road car with lowered and overdamped suspension that could happen hence making it worth measuring both rear wheels. As for the fronts, although my second gearbox will have the Quaiffe ATB, my initial gearbox has an open (x-pin) diff so I will try the pot joints and an electronic average. The play worries me though, I haven't measured it accurately but there is at least 1mm on mine at the moment and the sensors I've ordered quote a maximum read gap of 2.75mm. However, as they are meant for ABS applications on CV joints they have internal gain control to compensate for eccentric runout, ie, if the joint starts to "whirl".
I'm happy with a single sensor on the front wheels with the ATB LSD, but I can see that other than going in a straight line the single rear wheel system will have it's limitations. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 02:24:14pm
I've drawn up a 3 wheel system as attached. As it would be very easy to extend in the future, I may stay with the 2 wheel for now. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
21st Feb, 2010 at 02:53:15pm
Your diodes from pin 11 to ground are the wrong way around !!!!
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 03:02:13pm
Thanks Rod. I did say that I do not know what I'm doing
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
21st Feb, 2010 at 03:06:45pm
Looks fine now, even the right symbol Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 03:10:07pm
On 21st Feb, 2010 Rod S said:
The play worries me though, I haven't measured it accurately but there is at least 1mm on mine at the moment and the sensors I've ordered quote a maximum read gap of 2.75mm. However, as they are meant for ABS applications on CV joints they have internal gain control to compensate for eccentric runout, ie, if the joint starts to "whirl". I'm using the LSD which has very well supported output shafts. Also new diff bearings and new bushes in the side plates which should hold things tight. The two output shaft adaptors for the LSD to the HS couplings are OK, but one is much tighter on the splines than the other, so that's the one I'll weld the trigger wheel to. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
21st Feb, 2010 at 03:55:00pm
paul , on the tvr im using a sensor mounted on the hub and a series of magnets on double sided tape on the inside of the wheel rim,this has worked for the speedo for ages ,might work ?
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
21st Feb, 2010 at 04:01:58pm
If it's good enough for Heath Robinson, then it's good enough for me
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 12:14:03pm
Well my bits arrived today,
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 02:29:25pm
excellent most my parts are on the way too :) Edited by Brett on 23rd Feb, 2010. Yes i moved to the darkside
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 05:44:34pm
On 23rd Feb, 2010 Brett said:
excellent most my parts are on the way too :) The more the better Brett:) Mine, now assembled ready for testing on my function generator (if I can figure out how to work it....) Four channels with external voltage regulation and overvoltage protection on the outputs.... That is only if it works of course Testing tommorow. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
297 Posts Member #: 2276 Senior Member sheffield / derby |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 07:11:54pm
hello
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 08:25:30pm
Well I did a quick test of machining the Pot joint for the ABS ring and much to my surprise, I can actually machine it in my cheap Clarke lathe
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 08:38:44pm
On 23rd Feb, 2010 Rod S said:
On 23rd Feb, 2010 Brett said:
excellent most my parts are on the way too :) The more the better Brett:) yes definitely i think an upgrade to megasquirt is in order though Yes i moved to the darkside
|
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 09:13:59pm
rod isnt there a chance that the pot will move up and down a bit and throw the signal off ,is it a lets see what happens thing ? Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
23rd Feb, 2010 at 09:22:50pm
On 23rd Feb, 2010 robert said:
rod isnt there a chance that the pot will move up and down a bit and throw the signal off ,is it a lets see what happens thing ? Yes, my main concern with them was using the pot joints at the front. If I can get these ABS rings to fit, the little sensors I've bought are specifically designed to work with them and are sensitive up to 2.75mm But, better still, they have inbuilt AGC so will ignore a varying gap or "whirl". Well that's what the datasheet says :) Plus I'll be running at very high frequency (42 teeth) so any errors on the D/A conversion should be minimised. But, as you say, let's see what happens Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
24th Feb, 2010 at 07:44:24am
cool , i suppose making sure the bearing that locates the pot is tight would help . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Megasquirt Traction Control | |||||||
|
Page: |