Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Show Us Yours! > Rod's build thread - new title - TSCi

Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Well, after getting it running again Friday evening, here was Saturday morning.....



A fair bit of antifreeze wasted. A jubilee clip had partially stripped its threads and when I left it to cool down overnight it apparently jumped off the threads completely. All down to one silicone hose that wasn't quite the right size it was quoted to be, I've bought another make now and it fits fine.


Then on Saturday, once I had it leak free on the coolant, oil started to pour down from the rocker cover onto the exhaust manifold and start to burn.... the rubber bushes in the hold-down bolts had perished so the gasket wasn't being compressed at one end.

So I gave up and, despite the weather warnings, went to MITP on Sunday.

Put a few more faces to names and got some new bushes for the rocker cover.

So, finally leak free and started again but once it started I shut it down to reset everything in TunerStudio that had been lost a few days ago, ie, start from scratch.

Then I discovered there is a lot more to version 0.999.7 than it just crashing on me and having to re-installed it a couple of days ago......

A lot of the functionallity has been removed and it has been re-named TunerStudio Lite.

If I want the bits I was using before back again, I apparently have to "upgrade" to a "paid for" version at a cost of US$39.95

I can't use MegaTune as it doesn't display all the menu options available (and needed) for the Siamese Code (for reasons that Jean has explained to me) and now I can't use TunerStudio to the extent I need unless I pay for it.

Don't get me wrong, there are several bits of software I use where I have to pay to use enhanced features, but this is the first time I had basic features removed and been asked to pay to have them put back again.

Presumably the reason it kept crashing last week is because the various ini files in my profile had bits that were free before and now don't work as I hadn't paid for them to start working again, even though I hadn't been told....

Look like MegaSquirt is now going all commercial just like the offshoot VEMS did.

Because I didn't realise this when I allowed the "upgrades" to go ahead on both my desktop and laptop, all my previous files are trashed so I have no way backwards.... except a very old laptop that I was going to use but it was too slow... which might have an earlier version on it.

Tonight's project, try and get that old laptop working.... and if I can't get the earlier version recovered, it will be teddies out of the cot tonight and project abandoned until MegaTune works fully with the code.

A shame because I had it running quite nicely this afternoon.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Carl S
Forum Mod

User Avatar

1927 Posts
Member #: 1761
Stalker

Bristol

Rod, Phil Tobin who has written TunerStudio, isn't affiliated with MegaSquirt at all. He wrote it all off his own bat.

Its a shame he's started to charge for it though, considering how much of a shambles the code still is. Very flakey piece of software which should still be in Alpha stages, yet he charges for it now.


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 16th Aug, 2010 Carl S said:
Rod, Phil Tobin who has written TunerStudio, isn't affiliated with MegaSquirt at all. He wrote it all off his own bat.

Its a shame he's started to charge for it though, considering how much of a shambles the code still is. Very flakey piece of software which should still be in Alpha stages, yet he charges for it now.


Carl, that may be so but unfortunately - as you have yet to find out - the siamese code doesn't work with Megatune.

Unless it's been fixed since I last tried, the Megatune menu misses off a lot of the Siamese code options because, as Jean has explained it to me, Megatune was designed for a small 640X480 screen so there is a limit to the vertical length of the menu.

And yes, the TS code really is shambles, I've had lots of problems, Graham more so.

But the removal of basic functionallity and "you don't get it back unless you pay" is the icing on the cake........

I will no longer use it on a point of principle. (unless I can recover the earlier version that worked).

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Carl S
Forum Mod

User Avatar

1927 Posts
Member #: 1761
Stalker

Bristol

Sorry I should have stated, I know about the size limitations of Megatune and why we are currently forced to use TunerStudio.

If anyone has access to the Megatune source, I could fix our dilema quite quickly :) But that's unlikely, so we'l have to hope they update it so that you can choose the resolution of your screen from somewhere in the software.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Just to provide a bit of balance to this discusson.

I thought that the price was reasonable and paid up.

I have never had any problems with Tuner Studio, before or after.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

What OS are you running? you might be able to restore to a previous version of the application.


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 16th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
Just to provide a bit of balance to this discusson.

I thought that the price was reasonable and paid up.

I have never had any problems with Tuner Studio, before or after.


Sorry Paul, but my morals are slightly different.

If people like Jean write code for the benefit of all of us and it requires another bit of "open source" software to work, that's fine.

And if the writers of Megatune choose not to upgrade their "open source" software because there is another bit of "open source" software available that will do the job instead, that's fine.

But if the other "author" then removes the functionallity and says you now have to pay to have it back, I'm afraid that is morally bankrupt in my opinion.

So until Megatune supports the siamese code (or I can revert to a previous version of TS), I will be doing nothing more.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland




On 16th Aug, 2010 Carl S said:
Sorry I should have stated, I know about the size limitations of Megatune and why we are currently forced to use TunerStudio.

If anyone has access to the Megatune source, I could fix our dilema quite quickly :) But that's unlikely, so we'l have to hope they update it so that you can choose the resolution of your screen from somewhere in the software.


http://www.not2fast.com/megasquirt/mt/2.25/ third from the bottom, im not sure on the legalities of editing and distributing this, may be worth an e-mail to Eric Fahlgren. As an aside i never got around to using tunerstudio, rather glad now lol

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

The way TunerStudio went from a free "trials" version to a paid for version has irked quite a few people. I won't comment on it more than that... There has also been quite a few posts on this subject on the msextra forum.

MegaTunix is supposed to work with the latest alpha version (3.0.3u) but I'm not sure how well it works or how complete it is. But this is a fully open source and free project that is still being actively developed. So it could be an alternative.

The Megatune source code should be available if someone is interested in updating it. However, it's not a simple case of having it work with larger screens because there has been some additions to the ini format. But they may not be needed to have all the functions available. I'd have to check to make sure. And if someone does want to work on that code, I'll make the simplifications to the ini to have all the functions there if needed.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk


On 16th Aug, 2010 jbelanger said:
The way TunerStudio went from a free "trials" version to a paid for version has irked quite a few people. I won't comment on it more than that... There has also been quite a few posts on this subject on the msextra forum.


Thanks Jean, I'm glad I'm not the only one who have been irked.....

I haven't actually looked at the MS-Extra Forum much apart from to confirm that what I was seeing was not a "problem" but by design by the author.

If that was his/her long term plan, why not be honest enough to say so ???

My "morally bankrupt" statement remains.

So no more progress from me for a while.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

We will have to agree to disagree with this one.

I always feel in debt to these people who spend countless hours of their lives doing something that benefits thousands of others.

I was actually pleased to be able to make a payment.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
We will have to agree to disagree with this one.


Yes.

On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
I always feel in debt to these people who spend countless hours of their lives doing something that benefits thousands of others.


Agreed if it for no personal gain (or any personal gain is by selling "extras" which aren't actually required), otherwise it is just business, spending countless hours of their lives to make money - that's what we all do or have done, it's called working for a living.

On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
I was actually pleased to be able to make a payment.


There is a donate facility on the MS-Extra forums, lots of us make donations to this forum (we both have the avatar to prove it), and he/she could have done the same, and then it would have been personal choice. Or just offer the enhanced bits for sale (that is how Winlog, the TechEdge software works).

However, this seems to me to be a carefully planned series of events,

1 Rip off a copy of MegaTune - it's open source so quite easy - and add a few bits to make it look prettier and a bit of extra functionallity.

2 Develop it over a few months with input from users to encourage people to prefer it.

3 Force mandatory upgrades so people become accustomed to working the way he/she wants and thus make it harder to go back.

4 Desired knock-on effect occurs naturally, ie, MegaTune doesn't get updated, ie, can't show all the menu options now available in the Extra (siamese) code.

5 Ensure that the TS upgrades are on-line only, no insallation files downloaded so previous versions cannot be recovered.

6 Stop the upgrades being mandatory but replace it with annoying messages to make the user feel in control but will do what he/she wants anyway.

7 Finally, once he/she is confident MegaTune useage has declined enough, offer another upgrade (via annoying messages) that when the user goes to install it gives ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING that a lot of the basic functionallity will be removed and the user will have to pay to get it back again.

And I do mean BASIC functionallity, things that MegaTune has as standard and which I used in both MT and TS like being able to set the ranges of the gauges to something meaningfull to our particular use, being able to set scales to degrees centigrade rather than some pre-historic language called farenheit......

And I'm 99% sure that it was because I had my gauge ranges and scales set, that when I unwittingly agreed to the "upgrade", all my data got screwed because that basic feature was disabled with NO WARNING.

And the version on my old laptop turns out to be a very early version so won't work because the upgrade is mandatory and if I upgrade it, I will be screwed up anyway and I will lose the bits I had before.




So, yes, we will have to agree to disagree :)

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

It sounds like a very underhand thing to do. But principles aside, to call an utter halt to your progress for the sake of £25 or whatever strikes me as cutting off your nose to spite your face.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 17th Aug, 2010 Tom Fenton said:
.......But principles aside, to call an utter halt to your progress for the sake of £25 or whatever strikes me as cutting off your nose to spite your face.


You are right of course Tom, so I shall attempt to find a way around it.... but I will not pay US$40 as the way around it because of the underhand way it was done.

But he/she has been very devious - the obvious way around it is to go back to MegaTune to do the majority of the work and only use TS when I need access to the advanced menus - but another key feature, the ability to copy the msq from the ECU to the laptop, has also been removed in the TS "upgrade" so it will be very hard to keep the configuration files in step and very easy to make a mistake.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The development of Tuner Studio came about as Eric Falhgren no longer supported Megatune.

This then meant that to support the ongoing development of the MS/Extra code it was necessary for someone to eveolve it into something else and provide ongoing support.

We have assumed that Tuner Studio was going to be free, but was it possibly the case that it was always going to have a cost once fully developed? I never thought to ask.

If it will help Rod, I can lend you my TS registration code whilst I'm not using it. I really need you to keep your project moving.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Thanks for the offer Paul but whilst I'm standing on my high moral principles that would make me as devious and underhand as "Paul Tobin" whoever he/she is :)

It's not the cost, which is peanuts compared to everything else so far (as you can well appreciate), just the principle.

If he/she had been honest enough to say "when you click on this upgrade a load of things are going to stop working unless you send me some money", and I'm 99% sure all my data was corrupted as a result, then I would have had a choice.

Anyway, I'm now configuring an old laptop to run both MegaTune and TS "Lite" to see how easy it is to make some progress.

I'm setting it up on and old one as I'm sure at some point it will get hurled across the garage floor when I get the msq files out of step and I don't want to damage my good laptop :)

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


tadge44

3004 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

I dont pretend to understand all the technicalities on this thread but it has been fascinating to follow and it will be a great shame if it cannot continue.

Rod clearly has high principles as he has declined an offer of the use of the system he can no longer access, and I guess he would refuse the offer of someone else paying for him, or I would suggest that we chip in to help out -money is clearly not an issue for Rod,but giving it to this guy is !

Can you not reconsider Rod, and make life not only easier for yourself but continue this fascinating project ?

It might help stabilise your blood pressure too !


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Don't worry David, I'm continuing, just working my way around the issue at the moment (the old laptop I'm setting up is so....... slow........)

I am just mega pissed off about the way I came to be in this position and will not succumb to what I see as *********

So I've decided that working around what "Phil Tobin" has done is just another challenge to add to the list :)

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

[quote=Paul S,17th Aug, 2010]
We have assumed that Tuner Studio was going to be free, but was it possibly the case that it was always going to have a cost once fully developed? I never thought to ask.
quote]

I knew it had to be paid for in the longrun as it was stated on the original download site*oh well*


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 17th Aug, 2010 sturgeo said:
I knew it had to be paid for in the longrun as it was stated on the original download site*oh well*


That was never on the download site when I downloaded it (which must have been about the same time as you) because if it was, I would never have allowed an upgrade from a working version, I would have just ignored the annoying messages.

And even if it was stated somewhere previously, that is no excuse for enforcing it without any warning whatsoever during an upgrade.

Even Microsoft aren't that corrupt, they give you the choice.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

I spent some time today with all the settings within the software that had been corrupted by Ms Tobin's "upgrade" and thought I had found the problem ( a setting on injector frequency that was nearly doubling my fuel load) but even with that fixed it still ran far too rich.

So I deleted everything and re-loaded the whole siamese code to the cpu and, although a lot of other problems went away, I'm still too rich below 2K RPM.

So, I decided to set up the logging software rather than just watch it on screen or on the gauges... As I've mentioned earlier, I'm using TechEdges' "WinLog" software as it reads straight from the serial port of the MS2 as well as from the TechEdge widebands..... except, as I found out this evening, it only reads through the MS2 serial port if there is a working version of MegaTune running....

I never realised this last year as I was using Megatune by default (before Ms Tobin decided to try and screw me) so now I absolutely have to make MegaTune work again and, guess what, it won't..........

For some reason it won't accept the "ini" file from Jean's latest code and keeps reporting code mis-matches.....

I'm nearly beginning to think that filing an SU needle would be easier :)

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

im sorry rod ,but ,as your consulting psychoanalyst , it now becomes necessary to ban you from saying the 't 'word ever again ,as a 'avoidance of ocd' strategy ..!

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

I had to google "OCD" to what you want to prevent me from suffering from but I will take your advice......

After a bit of experimenting Megatune works up to MS-Extra release 303e but not 303r (I don't have any of the ones inbetween to see exactly when it stopped working) but as I'm using "r" and it's now up to "u" (which will apparently fix my closed loop idle problems) I think Megatune is dow dead in the water.....

Which is very annoying because the TechEdge software allowed me to log everything in one text deliniated file and has a superb display but takes all the MS2 data direct through the serial link but uses MegaTune as the interface....

As for the Tuning software, I'm going to try Jean's suggestion - MegaTunix.

As Jean says, the author states it works on the current release (303u) and having read a few threads on the Extra Forums it seems worth a go.

The author also states very clearly that it is free and his surname doesn't begin with "T".....

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

If the other software (whatever it was called) solves all your problems, then surely it is worth spending to use it?
If it was shitty and not worth the money I could understand it. But morals aside you are now making your own life difficult for the sake of £30. More to the point it is no real skin off the nose of the guy writing the software, so really it is only yourself that is being put out.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Fair point Tom but, as I found out yesterday, even if I spent the money, it isn't compatible with the way I was logging the data previously.

So life is difficult from now on anyway.

However, the alternative that Jean suggested looks very good - I've just downloaded it and am in the process of setting it up to suit my configuration.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???

Home > Show Us Yours! > Rod's build thread - new title - TSCi
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 3 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: