Page: |
Home > Show Us Yours! > Rod's build thread - new title - TSCi | |||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
16th Aug, 2010 at 07:10:56pm
Well, after getting it running again Friday evening, here was Saturday morning.....
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Forum Mod 1927 Posts Member #: 1761 Stalker Bristol |
16th Aug, 2010 at 07:53:23pm
Rod, Phil Tobin who has written TunerStudio, isn't affiliated with MegaSquirt at all. He wrote it all off his own bat.
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
16th Aug, 2010 at 08:10:52pm
On 16th Aug, 2010 Carl S said:
Rod, Phil Tobin who has written TunerStudio, isn't affiliated with MegaSquirt at all. He wrote it all off his own bat. Its a shame he's started to charge for it though, considering how much of a shambles the code still is. Very flakey piece of software which should still be in Alpha stages, yet he charges for it now. Carl, that may be so but unfortunately - as you have yet to find out - the siamese code doesn't work with Megatune. Unless it's been fixed since I last tried, the Megatune menu misses off a lot of the Siamese code options because, as Jean has explained it to me, Megatune was designed for a small 640X480 screen so there is a limit to the vertical length of the menu. And yes, the TS code really is shambles, I've had lots of problems, Graham more so. But the removal of basic functionallity and "you don't get it back unless you pay" is the icing on the cake........ I will no longer use it on a point of principle. (unless I can recover the earlier version that worked). Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Forum Mod 1927 Posts Member #: 1761 Stalker Bristol |
16th Aug, 2010 at 08:44:19pm
Sorry I should have stated, I know about the size limitations of Megatune and why we are currently forced to use TunerStudio.
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Aug, 2010 at 09:34:05pm
Just to provide a bit of balance to this discusson.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
857 Posts Member #: 1778 Post Whore Northants |
16th Aug, 2010 at 09:44:43pm
What OS are you running? you might be able to restore to a previous version of the application. |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
16th Aug, 2010 at 09:55:20pm
On 16th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
Just to provide a bit of balance to this discusson. I thought that the price was reasonable and paid up. I have never had any problems with Tuner Studio, before or after. Sorry Paul, but my morals are slightly different. If people like Jean write code for the benefit of all of us and it requires another bit of "open source" software to work, that's fine. And if the writers of Megatune choose not to upgrade their "open source" software because there is another bit of "open source" software available that will do the job instead, that's fine. But if the other "author" then removes the functionallity and says you now have to pay to have it back, I'm afraid that is morally bankrupt in my opinion. So until Megatune supports the siamese code (or I can revert to a previous version of TS), I will be doing nothing more. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
16th Aug, 2010 at 10:15:51pm
On 16th Aug, 2010 Carl S said:
Sorry I should have stated, I know about the size limitations of Megatune and why we are currently forced to use TunerStudio. If anyone has access to the Megatune source, I could fix our dilema quite quickly :) But that's unlikely, so we'l have to hope they update it so that you can choose the resolution of your screen from somewhere in the software. http://www.not2fast.com/megasquirt/mt/2.25/ third from the bottom, im not sure on the legalities of editing and distributing this, may be worth an e-mail to Eric Fahlgren. As an aside i never got around to using tunerstudio, rather glad now lol turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
1267 Posts Member #: 831 Post Whore Montreal, Canada |
16th Aug, 2010 at 10:22:11pm
The way TunerStudio went from a free "trials" version to a paid for version has irked quite a few people. I won't comment on it more than that... There has also been quite a few posts on this subject on the msextra forum.
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
16th Aug, 2010 at 10:37:50pm
On 16th Aug, 2010 jbelanger said:
The way TunerStudio went from a free "trials" version to a paid for version has irked quite a few people. I won't comment on it more than that... There has also been quite a few posts on this subject on the msextra forum. Thanks Jean, I'm glad I'm not the only one who have been irked..... I haven't actually looked at the MS-Extra Forum much apart from to confirm that what I was seeing was not a "problem" but by design by the author. If that was his/her long term plan, why not be honest enough to say so ??? My "morally bankrupt" statement remains. So no more progress from me for a while. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
17th Aug, 2010 at 09:23:08am
We will have to agree to disagree with this one.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Aug, 2010 at 10:17:20am
On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
We will have to agree to disagree with this one. Yes. On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
I always feel in debt to these people who spend countless hours of their lives doing something that benefits thousands of others. Agreed if it for no personal gain (or any personal gain is by selling "extras" which aren't actually required), otherwise it is just business, spending countless hours of their lives to make money - that's what we all do or have done, it's called working for a living. On 17th Aug, 2010 Paul S said:
I was actually pleased to be able to make a payment. There is a donate facility on the MS-Extra forums, lots of us make donations to this forum (we both have the avatar to prove it), and he/she could have done the same, and then it would have been personal choice. Or just offer the enhanced bits for sale (that is how Winlog, the TechEdge software works). However, this seems to me to be a carefully planned series of events, 1 Rip off a copy of MegaTune - it's open source so quite easy - and add a few bits to make it look prettier and a bit of extra functionallity. 2 Develop it over a few months with input from users to encourage people to prefer it. 3 Force mandatory upgrades so people become accustomed to working the way he/she wants and thus make it harder to go back. 4 Desired knock-on effect occurs naturally, ie, MegaTune doesn't get updated, ie, can't show all the menu options now available in the Extra (siamese) code. 5 Ensure that the TS upgrades are on-line only, no insallation files downloaded so previous versions cannot be recovered. 6 Stop the upgrades being mandatory but replace it with annoying messages to make the user feel in control but will do what he/she wants anyway. 7 Finally, once he/she is confident MegaTune useage has declined enough, offer another upgrade (via annoying messages) that when the user goes to install it gives ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING that a lot of the basic functionallity will be removed and the user will have to pay to get it back again. And I do mean BASIC functionallity, things that MegaTune has as standard and which I used in both MT and TS like being able to set the ranges of the gauges to something meaningfull to our particular use, being able to set scales to degrees centigrade rather than some pre-historic language called farenheit...... And I'm 99% sure that it was because I had my gauge ranges and scales set, that when I unwittingly agreed to the "upgrade", all my data got screwed because that basic feature was disabled with NO WARNING. And the version on my old laptop turns out to be a very early version so won't work because the upgrade is mandatory and if I upgrade it, I will be screwed up anyway and I will lose the bits I had before. So, yes, we will have to agree to disagree :) Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
17th Aug, 2010 at 10:29:18am
It sounds like a very underhand thing to do. But principles aside, to call an utter halt to your progress for the sake of £25 or whatever strikes me as cutting off your nose to spite your face.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Aug, 2010 at 10:56:46am
On 17th Aug, 2010 Tom Fenton said:
.......But principles aside, to call an utter halt to your progress for the sake of £25 or whatever strikes me as cutting off your nose to spite your face. You are right of course Tom, so I shall attempt to find a way around it.... but I will not pay US$40 as the way around it because of the underhand way it was done. But he/she has been very devious - the obvious way around it is to go back to MegaTune to do the majority of the work and only use TS when I need access to the advanced menus - but another key feature, the ability to copy the msq from the ECU to the laptop, has also been removed in the TS "upgrade" so it will be very hard to keep the configuration files in step and very easy to make a mistake. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
17th Aug, 2010 at 11:36:20am
The development of Tuner Studio came about as Eric Falhgren no longer supported Megatune.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Aug, 2010 at 12:17:43pm
Thanks for the offer Paul but whilst I'm standing on my high moral principles that would make me as devious and underhand as "Paul Tobin" whoever he/she is :)
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
3004 Posts Member #: 2500 Post Whore Buckinghamshire |
17th Aug, 2010 at 01:18:57pm
I dont pretend to understand all the technicalities on this thread but it has been fascinating to follow and it will be a great shame if it cannot continue.
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Aug, 2010 at 01:28:59pm
Don't worry David, I'm continuing, just working my way around the issue at the moment (the old laptop I'm setting up is so....... slow........)
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
857 Posts Member #: 1778 Post Whore Northants |
17th Aug, 2010 at 02:00:44pm
[quote=Paul S,17th Aug, 2010]
|
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
17th Aug, 2010 at 02:58:27pm
On 17th Aug, 2010 sturgeo said:
I knew it had to be paid for in the longrun as it was stated on the original download site That was never on the download site when I downloaded it (which must have been about the same time as you) because if it was, I would never have allowed an upgrade from a working version, I would have just ignored the annoying messages. And even if it was stated somewhere previously, that is no excuse for enforcing it without any warning whatsoever during an upgrade. Even Microsoft aren't that corrupt, they give you the choice. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
18th Aug, 2010 at 09:57:13pm
I spent some time today with all the settings within the software that had been corrupted by Ms Tobin's "upgrade" and thought I had found the problem ( a setting on injector frequency that was nearly doubling my fuel load) but even with that fixed it still ran far too rich.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Aug, 2010 at 08:21:04am
im sorry rod ,but ,as your consulting psychoanalyst , it now becomes necessary to ban you from saying the 't 'word ever again ,as a 'avoidance of ocd' strategy ..! Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
19th Aug, 2010 at 09:08:34am
I had to google "OCD" to what you want to prevent me from suffering from but I will take your advice......
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
19th Aug, 2010 at 09:42:18am
If the other software (whatever it was called) solves all your problems, then surely it is worth spending to use it?
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
19th Aug, 2010 at 09:54:49am
Fair point Tom but, as I found out yesterday, even if I spent the money, it isn't compatible with the way I was logging the data previously.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
Home > Show Us Yours! > Rod's build thread - new title - TSCi | |||||||
|
Page: |