Page: |
Home > MS Code Discussions > Why do we truly need to advance the injection ??? | |||||||
20 Posts Member #: 799 Member Canada, eh? |
4th Jan, 2006 at 08:12:57pm
Now if I could figure out how to post pictures here, you'd see this:
Edited by TurboDave16V on 4th Jan, 2006.
|
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
4th Jan, 2006 at 08:14:47pm
On 04/01/2006 19:37:56 mrbell said:
10.5 * (77hp * 0.45)/(2 * 440cc/min) = 0.41 We know from numerous RR printouts in the mags, and 'stories' from tuners, that 90hp seems to be the absolute, top-end, 100% max hp limit on the MPi's - no matter what is done to them with heads, cams, compression, whatever... Plugging a 90hp value into the above, we're sat only at 0.47... However - assume 90hp, and 0.5 BSFC and you're up at 0.54... That's close enough for me. Edited by TurboDave16V on 4th Jan, 2006. On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
20 Posts Member #: 799 Member Canada, eh? |
4th Jan, 2006 at 08:18:03pm
Now if I could figure out how to post pictures here, you'd see this:
|
||||||
47 Posts Member #: 830 Member SLC, UT |
4th Jan, 2006 at 08:30:16pm
On 04/01/2006 20:14:47 TurboDave said:
On 04/01/2006 19:37:56 mrbell said:
10.5 * (77hp * 0.45)/(2 * 440cc/min) = 0.41 We know from numerous RR printouts in the mags, and 'stories' from tuners, that 90hp seems to be the absolute, top-end, 100% max hp limit on the MPi's - no matter what is done to them with heads, cams, compression, whatever... Plugging a 90hp value into the above, we're sat only at 0.47... However - assume 90hp, and 0.5 BSFC and you're up at 0.54... That's close enough for me. Ah... alright... I just want to make sure we've actually got as large of a window as we think we do. If it's smaller, that could be the problem we're seeing. -Tyler
|
||||||
1267 Posts Member #: 831 Post Whore Montreal, Canada |
4th Jan, 2006 at 08:34:17pm
Marcel,
|
||||||
20 Posts Member #: 799 Member Canada, eh? |
5th Jan, 2006 at 02:53:59am
On 04/01/2006 20:34:17 jbelanger said:
Anyways, do you have any suggestion on how you could automatically detect that you ran out of injection window time instead of having a wrong advance? Looks like you want to retrace all my research steps, eh? Well, here's a couple of things you can chew on (hoping my image posting actually works!, stole some html code...): This shows that there's and upper ceiling to the fuel map. When you do the code there should be a warning set for when the pulse width is longer than the opportunity. BTW, the map line here is from Marc whazzizname in Netherlands who kept insisting that he had a DTA controlled EFI. This map showed that it couldn't possibly be running port injection and in fact it is a wet manifold system. This is something I did to give the perspective of what's happening in the port. It's the sum total of valve lift. If you add the #1 exhaust valve you can see that the pressure pulses in the port are pretty weird, which is what gives the A and B series their unique exhaust note and makes Helmholtz tuning impossible. Now Dave is going to have another sleepless night! Edited by curta_crankn_daddy on 5th Jan, 2006.
|
||||||
Home > MS Code Discussions > Why do we truly need to advance the injection ??? | |||||||
|
Page: |