Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Who's actually got this running on a 5 port???

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I understand that one of Jims main concerns is getting it setup on a Dyno and the available expertise to help get the results that he is looking for. Having had a pure racer sat in the garage for a year just needing setting up, I can fully understand.

However, if I was tasked with setting up a wet manifold system with limited opportunities for adjusting the fuel distribution or, alternatively, a point injection system with an injector timing table (same as a spark advance table) that allows you to richen the inners with a bit more advance and vice versa, I know which one I would choose.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

But Dave,

That's just back full circle to siamese code injection - the ability to time the injection pulses into tiny windows with large injectors (and MS2 allows different VE tables as well).

Jim's original point was that no RR operator understood that.

I agree entirely it would be the best solution (esp as you say injectors right by the head) but if there isn't a RR willing to try it, it misses the point (I think).

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

No, Jims point was that no RR operator who would be willing to use megasquirt understands that.
In Dave walker he has someone who understands the problem, and has an ECU that (at least for nat-asp) has the adjustability to make this work (in theory of course).

I'll be blunt here - I hear this a lot stateside about megasquirt, and it seems to be the same in the UK; that many RR operators don't want to be associated with MS - perhaps they see it as potentially giving problems, which comes back on them? I think it genuinely is more the stigma of it.

Edited by TurboDave16V on 14th Sep, 2012.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

If the Emerald has the features of fully sequential and an injection timing table, plus Dave Walker to set it up, why not go port injection????

I don't use anything siamese specific on my engines now. Just a standard MS3/3X....

Edited by Paul S on 14th Sep, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Paul - so you do have an injection advnace, but is this per individual (or paired) cylinders, or just one advance table for all? The Emerald just has one advance table. It also has the ability to set the injection 'point' at the start or end of injection (basically advancing the 'turning on' of the pulse as the injector pulse grows).
I'm thinking, and I'm sure i read that you guys have individual timing, but I can't see any major disadvantages - as you say, the priority is getting the fuel to make it into the outside cylinders without being too early or too late...

Edited by TurboDave16V on 14th Sep, 2012.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Just a single pulse for each pair of cylinders and a single advance table. Mid pulse, so that AE, ASE etc spread the pulse each way.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Part of me is saying "Jim, fit this induction system to your engine and hook up to your Emerald and see what you can do"

Edited by Paul S on 14th Sep, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Well we all agree - just need to convince Jimbo now that port injection for such a peaky, nat-asp motor really will benefit more from having straight runners (instead of the two near-90 degree bends of the MG metro inlet) and the ability to tune these runners with tapers and bellmouths (compared to the wet manifold).


Edited by TurboDave16V on 14th Sep, 2012.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 14th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
Well we all agree



Haha - is that the royal "We" ?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Wow.

I take it back, let me rephrase:

Well, it appears that some of us have a mutual agreement that on paper, Emerald has the capacity to run port injection, and that Jimbo should perhaps try this as the lead approach.

Sorry for any confusion, upset or otherwise. *tongue*


On 4th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
So who is running the MS EFI then, and what HP has been achieved?

dum de dum...



Edited by TurboDave16V on 15th Sep, 2012.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

Yes the emerald is a good piece of kit for the money, I'm now thinking of getting a motec ect as an up grade.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 14th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
Wow.

I take it back, let me rephrase:

Well, it appears that some of us have a mutual agreement that on paper, Emerald has the capacity to run port injection, and that Jimbo should perhaps try this as the lead approach.

Sorry for any confusion, upset or otherwise. *tongue*


On 4th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
So who is running the MS EFI then, and what HP has been achieved?

dum de dum...





paul and john ,at 120 bhp on the 998 i think ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 14th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
Wow.

I take it back, let me rephrase:

Well, it appears that some of us have a mutual agreement that on paper, Emerald has the capacity to run port injection, and that Jimbo should perhaps try this as the lead approach.

Sorry for any confusion, upset or otherwise. *tongue*


On 4th Sep, 2012 TurboDave16V said:
So who is running the MS EFI then, and what HP has been achieved?

dum de dum...



For what it's worth, I tend to agree with your earlier thoughts "......that port injection for such a peaky, nat-asp motor really will benefit more from having straight runners (instead of the two near-90 degree bends of the MG metro inlet) and the ability to tune these runners with tapers and bellmouths (compared to the wet manifold)."

But I can only say "tend" to agree based on what I've seen what others have done and recorded, but you won't find the full picture anywhere unless/until someone does the actual comparison - I think I may have said that a few times before over the last couple of years :)

Re. Emerald, I know very little about it nor do I have any knowledge of Dave Walker's abilities with it (I don't even know who Dave Walker is, I've just heard the name mentioned occassionaly...).

Whether it has the same flexibility of an MS2 for altering port injection parameters, again, I don't know.

For example, does it allow two different injection timing tables (2D load/RPM tables, not just fixed values) for the inner/outer pulses. Does it allow seperate adjustments to the VE tables for the inner/outer pulses thus allowing different pulse widths between inner and outer. Does it allow the timing point to be set start, mid, or end of pulse so the pulse can expand forwards, symettrically, or backwards. Does it allow the two pulses to merge seemlessly into one at any chosen RPM with a third injection timing table and third VE table. Does it allow staged injection on top of all that.

If it can do most of what's on that list then I'm sure it could be made to outperform a Weber in the scenario you describe so, in that case, I would then agree with you.

But it really does come back to the ability/willingness of someone to set it all up. A wet manifold is easy, all of the above is not.

As per your last point, (1) a small number including myself and (2) I haven't a clue, it's not what I set out to achieve, and I doubt it will ever go near a dyno as it doesn't need to in order to setup an MS2 with all the other instrumentation I have all over it. I currently only have single injectors per runner (not staged yet) so at 2 X 1000cc/min and 2 X 20% duty theoretical max is ~130BHP (and the engine is currently out of the car to fit the TC senders and wiring anyway).

And as you said earlier, output figures are much more down to choice of engine specification (cam, turbo choice etc.) rather than efi vs carb and for a high power efi port injection, a staged setup will be required (or very large injectors which equals crap lowdown and idle performance, which of course may not be such an issue in Jim's case), but wet manifold is so much simpler for high power as the injector duty cycle is so much greater.


EDIT - one other point to Dave, to run the stup you suggest would most likely require an alpha-N setup, not speed/density. That reduces the number to your second question considerably. I can only think of one person on this forum and he hasn't posted recently.

Edited by Rod S on 15th Sep, 2012.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 15th Sep, 2012 robert said:


paul and john ,at 120 bhp on the 998 i think ?


Add 30% more engine capacity, 30% more boost and 30% more revs and you have ?????

No reason why the SOT we achieved could not be improved.

Robert, pull your finger out :)

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

last night I got my wet manifold injection wired up and runnning. I'm on the rolling road Friday, I'll either come back with metled pistons or a grin. I still want to keep my 100bhp per litre, but gain drivability.

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

go big or go home.... let us know how you get on jim and your unbiased thoughts :)

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

Good luck jim

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

A long day, but after leving the house before 6am, and getting home after midnight I can confirm that back to back tests on the rolling road saw 3bhp gains with efi wet manifold over a 45. With the efi torque came in earlier, and held on for longer. I'll post photos when I get a chance. I'm using 4 injectors. And a single 52mm TB ( which I think is too large for a 1120cc)

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


John

User Avatar

10021 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

Congrats Jim. Would like to see comparisons of the graphs. Shame you didn't get the dual wide bands in time.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4625 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

Nice going Jim.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Yo-Han

User Avatar

971 Posts
Member #: 3228
Post Whore

North of the Netherlands

That's interesting Jim.
Any pictures of the efi setup?

Dazed and Confused....


Star Mag

User Avatar

1745 Posts
Member #: 375
Post Whore

Leicestershire

Just seen a vid on bookface sounds proper!! Good result👍


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

I still need to upload some pictures. I'll try and do this tonight when I get home, there are a few on my facebook page.

All has been good with the engine, two rolling road sessions (over 100bhp per litre) 9 race starts, 9 race finsihes and a race win. I've had the head of to check everything over and it all looks much better than it did when it was breathing through a 45 carb. The next stage is to make a new manifold whihc does not use a SU manifold, which is nice and long for better lower end torque. This works so well out of the box I'll never run a carb again on any a series engine I own.

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

I never took any notice of this as FI just goes over my head, but im gonna have to read all of this when I get a chance

I seriously doubt it!


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

Jim are you using the SC kit then or a home brew?

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!

Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Who's actually got this running on a 5 port???
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 6 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: