Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Show Us Yours! > project 31 8k 5 port

Advantage

User Avatar

1137 Posts
Member #: 1450
Post Whore

Near Paris - France

I assume there is :
an optimal valve opening speed
an optimal lift for a given valve size
an optimal cam shape for valve train reliability
and a car manufacturer sells durability and reasonable fuel consumption and tries to do that the cheapest way possible.

If optimal valve opening speed is out of reach of optimal cam shape for valve train reliability and the compromise sought after by the car manufacturer does not require it, then we end up with a rocker ratio less than optimal on a power point of view.

That being said, our car manufacturer probably got the best of what was available otherwise.
So he designed a 850 engine and stretched it to 1275 over the years but the DNA of the engine is still there.

I believe cam follower diameter is the limiting factor on the cam side so the only other way to increase valve speed opening is rocker ratio.

Well, that sounded like a can of worm post all right !

Rusty by nature

On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:

They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!"


Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

this might be of some use:

this is what pipemax spits out for the bottom end:

i'm no expert but shaving a few grams of a piston makes sense if you see the G loadings

8000 rpm:
------- Piston Motion Data -------
Average Piston Speed (M/S)= 21,69 in Meters per Second
Maximum Piston Speed (M/S)= 35,37 occurs at 75,451 Degrees ATDC
Piston Depth at 75,451 degree ATDC= 35,8540 MM Cylinder Volume= 152,1 CC
Maximum TDC Rod Tension GForce= 3720,62 G's
Maximum BDC Rod Compression GForce= 2099,97 G's

9000 rpm

Average Piston Speed (M/S)= 24,40 in Meters per Second
Maximum Piston Speed (M/S)= 39,79 occurs at 75,451 Degrees ATDC
Piston Depth at 75,451 degree ATDC= 35,8540 MM Cylinder Volume= 152,1 CC
Maximum TDC Rod Tension GForce= 4708,91 G's
Maximum BDC Rod Compression GForce= 2657,77 G's

Edited by Sir Yun on 8th Jul, 2012.

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

yunmiester, what weight of piston and rod was that for ?
it would be great if you could run it for the weight of a stock rod piston combo ,and then my lighter combination ,and see how high up the rpm range it gets before it exceeds the loads on a stock setup.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

Hi robert,

I just copy pasted what pipemax spits out. It just uses the rod and stoke to calculate but it does not consider geometry of the entire assembly. ( piston offset ect ect)

It's in G's so you have to take the mass of the combo and multiply it (sort off as it is a little more complicated due to the surprisingly complex geometry).

If you really want to know what goes on you should model the whole lot in pro engineer or something alike and do a FEA.. I'd like to but i don;t have the apps or the skill :(



edit// 138 gram weight saving.. about 5036 N load less



I have NO clue on the tensile properties of an a-series rod, so when it's going to go bang is hard to predict. Judging from what I have read think you could consider nitrocaburising the rods but not the caps as they deform too much

Edited by Sir Yun on 12th Jul, 2012.

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

bit of progress , red is new port design ,and the jiggly lines below are the % improvements over a stock 33mm port ..







i have found a way to get about 130 cfm ,so thats my next step .....all this with the 35.7mm valve. :)

Edited by robert on 16th Jul, 2012.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


jlay

User Avatar

319 Posts
Member #: 1742
Senior Member

essex

nice. now thats a handy bit of kit

My small bore turbo project http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=473901


supermotolee

614 Posts
Member #: 2153
Post Whore

kings langley

this really is cool!

Speeding is like masturbating, everyone does it, but not all of us film it and put it on the internet

[quote=fab,8th Oct, 2010]fuck off


adrian

432 Posts
Member #: 2726
Senior Member

wakefield

Wish I had such a fun toy in my shed to tinker with. Good stuff.


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

been playing with the seats robert?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

impressive gains !! . i reckon its changed just below the seat area ?

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 17th Jul, 2012 Sir Yun said:
impressive gains !! . i reckon its changed just below the seat area ?


hi chaps ,, seat work tends to help low lift flows , its more throat and guide work to remove larger high lift flow restrictions ...whilst of course trying to keep speed up ,and c.s.a. down .just ordered some port putty to try filling in dead areas .i have not actually done any work on the seats yet .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Some old geezer earlier in the year was telling me that they have started adding material in certain areas of the port, to gain an increase.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

i have seen a lot of filled ports but i'm always worried it comes off and gets munched ..

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Depends on the glue,

there are glues out there that will survive in the exhaust ports!

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

Asi thought then.impressive gains ,i have to see of there is room for improvement in my head as well . how much lift are you going to run ? if you use 1.5 rockers you get quite a bit of lift on overlap with most cams and i don't know if you want that with a turbo.on the other hand without high lift rockers it is hard to get adequate lift without big lifters and a billet profile I think. it was not NA was it ?!



my original model used a lower flow head ,so my cam will change spec ,but i am expecting ti run between 420 and 520 thou lift .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

Home > Show Us Yours! > project 31 8k 5 port
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 4 Guests) <- Prev  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: