Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Who's actually got this running on a 5 port???

Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

what kind of EGT temps are you guys seeing? I've not got sensors mounted but using an infrared thermometer my centre exhaust port is 512 deg c at idle

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I logged around 700 Deg C on the centre branch on a low compression, low revving 998.

On my simulation of a stonking NA 1293, I've seen peaks of around 1300 Deg C as the exhaust valve opens.

The outer cylinders tend to run around 120 Deg C lower as the thermocouple only picks up a cycle average.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


KLAS

89 Posts
Member #: 2380
Advanced Member

Hamburg, Germany

thats why professional grade equipment measure the pressure now, too.
like http://www.ecm-co.com/product.asp?5220
nothing for the average people, for sure


On 12th Sep, 2012 Rod S said:


So if the datasheet is correct (ish), of course you can calculate the actual AFRs but only if you measure the actual pressures at the LSU.


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

IMO Jim for the set up for the race car your taking about, I don't think you'll gain any thing over a well set up carb.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Fueling issues aside, the biggest impact on power will be any change of inlet runner length and diameter.

If you change from a weber to a TB on an SU manifold, your inlet pulses will no longer suit the cam and head meaning a loss of VE.

IMO you should stick with the runner length from the head flange to the weber inlet trumpet.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

thanks for all the input guys, if I could get the carb to fuel perfectly all the way through the rev range then I would keep it, but currently it's a compromise

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 13th Sep, 2012 Jimster said:
thanks for all the input guys, if I could get the carb to fuel perfectly all the way through the rev range then I would keep it, but currently it's a compromise


Remember what Dave Wlker was talking about with a Weber and lower RPM on a wild cam *wink* and how EFI totally transformed it. Nothing to stop you using a Jenvey on the same Weber manifold with a pair of smaller injectors sized for the duty, fired in batch mode.

Also, remind me. I know there has been testing with a carb that shows cylinder AFR imbalance, and testing with the siamease code to show that it fundamentally works, but has there been testing with the SPi manifold or a custom double barrel to show that is any worse than a carb? Its been so long since all this started and I don't remember.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzU9QBAr1kc...player_embedded

The Dyno really does not lye same power same torque different manifold and pulls from lower down isnt this what you want Jim ?

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

pretty much thats what I need.

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

why do they open the throttle so slow in that video? btw i have no sound just looks weird...

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

Power and torque might be good but that video also shows that fuel distribution is not good when you see even EGTs on all three ports (even though they claim it's a good thing).

How bad it actually is and what the consequences will be, I don't know. But there is definitely room for improvement.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

Ever thought about using twin hif44's instead of the webber? Suposidly when tuned properly it gives alot better driveablity but keeps about the same for power, you could also still use good sized trumpets and mod the butterfly and carb body for better flow

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 13th Sep, 2012 jbelanger said:
Power and torque might be good but that video also shows that fuel distribution is not good when you see even EGTs on all three ports (even though they claim it's a good thing).

How bad it actually is and what the consequences will be, I don't know. But there is definitely room for improvement.

Jean


I don't know about the consequences but I've logged lots of EGT and AFR data. The only time that the EGTs were the same was when the AFRs were 4 points apart. i.e. 15:1 on the outers and 11:1 on the inners. Turd polishing IMO.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

I will not be logging egt's on this engine, only AFR's.

I understand what your saying about twin SU's but I'm trying to move forward, and twin carbs will be even harder to setup than a simple 45

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk


On 13th Sep, 2012 Sprocket said:

Also, remind me. I know there has been testing with a carb that shows cylinder AFR imbalance, and testing with the siamease code to show that it fundamentally works, but has there been testing with the SPi manifold or a custom double barrel to show that is any worse than a carb? Its been so long since all this started and I don't remember.


Colin, I wish someone would.
Maybe someone has, but I've seen nothing on this forum.
And it's so easy on a N/A setup.



On 13th Sep, 2012 jbelanger said:
Power and torque might be good but that video also shows that fuel distribution is not good when you see even EGTs on all three ports (even though they claim it's a good thing).


I looked that video up again yesterday (mainly to see what their peak EGTs were as Jimster asked) but it only shows the part throttle readings.
If you go back to the rather "fraught" thread originally on the SC setup, JK did say that his initial statement of EGRs being close was at part throttle and they were about 120 apart under load (which matches Paul/myself).
Unfortunately, like the AFRs, there isn't any real data at load (apart from torque/power).



On 13th Sep, 2012 Jimster said:
I will not be logging egt's on this engine, only AFR's.


Jim, I genuinely look forward to the results.
It won't put the turbo arguement to bed but will go a long way towards showing whether a wet manifold injection (with discrete pulses) can match a carb (continuous flow).
Any chance you will fit the two widebands before you take the weber off and give us some direct comparison ???

Rod.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

Jim I can't see why you can't get suitable mixtures, you just need to get it to a good rolling road guy, get to T&M in colchester *wink*

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Haha - 3 way tug of war.

Place your bets lads :)

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

I want to put the carb to bed, so want to try EFI, if I gain nothing I'll put it back on, but at least I know I've tried it. I will try dual wide bands before I remove the carb.
What I can’t understand is why I can’t got for a jenvey style twin TB to bolt on to the existing inlet manifold (rather than use a single TB like the video above). My thought is as long as the injectors are as close to the butterfly as possible then it should still work as good as a carb?? What are your thoughts on this???

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The Jenvey twin TB on the existing manifold would be a great solution but you would run into problems with batch injection.

Each throttle would flow for approx. 360 degrees of a cycle filling first the inner cylinder and then the outer. Then there would be no flow for approx. 360 degrees whilst the other throttle fills the other 2 cylinders. If you inject during the dead period, then most of that fuel will go into the inner cylinder and very little in the outer.

You would need to inject about 60% of the port fuel requirement whilst the outer cylinder inlet valve is open.

The Holy Grail of 5 port injection is to get enough fuel into the outer cylinders.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 14th Sep, 2012 Jimster said:
..... I will try dual wide bands before I remove the carb.


Good

On 14th Sep, 2012 Jimster said:
I
What I can’t understand is why I can’t got for a jenvey style twin TB to bolt on to the existing inlet manifold (rather than use a single TB like the video above). My thought is as long as the injectors are as close to the butterfly as possible then it should still work as good as a carb?? What are your thoughts on this???


A bit tricky to explain but here goes.....

To best replicate a carb (continuous mixing of air/fuel) an injection system needs to fire a minimum of 4 pulses per engine cycle with a high enough duty cycle (amount of time injector(s) are open compared to closed) to best mix the fuel/air.

But more importantly it needs to be done where the airflow is reasonably constant (for the given engine load).

The SC kit in the video probably uses two injectors (right next to each other) just for capacity though if JK reads this I'm sure he can clarify.

A weber setup, or twin throttle bodies feeding the two inlet ports independantly, will not have a continuous flow of air down each one, they will only flow air for half the engine cycle.
EDIT - depending whether the manifold has a balance pipe or not, but even if it does, the air flow will still pulse as the balance pipe won't flow the same as the main runner - END edit

So, for a start, you would need an ECU that runs sequential to match the alternating airflows and would need an injection regime that tried to add fuel to moving air.

Otherwise you could be injecting into stagnant air which not only would be minimal mixing, but could pool fuel in the runner, or adhere to the walls, just to be sucked into the first valve that opens (inner) which is basically the fundamental siamese port issue.

7/8 ports don't care if you pool the fuel in the runner or stick it to the walls (apart from things like acceleration enrichment but that's stil an equal problem on all cylinders), ultimately it will all go in the correct cylinder when the inlet valve(s) for that cylinder open.

So in summary, if you tried two throttle bodies, you really have a form of port injection (but with injection a long way from the ports) and all the problems that go with it.

The only realistic way you can run a "wet manifold" system and try to make an "electronic carb" is to replicate a single carb on a combined manifold.

Hope that makes sense.

Edited by Rod S on 14th Sep, 2012.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

I was initially concerned about the direction of this thread, but its turned round nicely. Im actually understanding more of the problem and the reasons the different options are less than ideal. Keep it up *smiley*

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


NB

User Avatar

55 Posts
Member #: 10097
Advanced Member

Bristol

knowledge dropped. interesting read so far this, i'll be persuing something similar in the future so i'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with, Jim.


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9403 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

thanks guys, some good info. I think I'll go with the single TB, I'll do back to back tests on the dyno too. I'll keep you posted on how I get on.

Is there a calcuation to work out optimum TB size to keep port velocity up?

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

What about a modified head abit like carls twini with injectors pointing at each port, keep the standard port with i jectors coming from the top if that makes sence? Have them crossed so they fire to the opposit side for space? Surely then you wouldnt need siamease inj and use standard style setup?
Us the thin injectors and it could work, its different and new and could be the 5port efi solution, i would personally do this but dont have the machinary or tech knowlege.

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Jim has fully sequential available to him, and the Emerald system that he already owns has an injector advance table. He doesn't have to pass the MOT, and the engine needs to make the beans between 6000 and 9000 rpm, and have better throttle response and pickup than the carb. Basically - his target is outright power in a somewhat limited powerband (albeit one with a tiny injection window)

I just think that he will be overall better off with straight runners (and ITB's) on each intake, which will better allow him to tinker with induction lengths.

Two of the modern Deka fast-responding injectors right by the head, and upping the baseline fuel pressure to 4bar, maybe more will all help.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY


Home > A-Series EFI / Injection > Who's actually got this running on a 5 port???
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 6 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: