Page: |
Home > 998cc > turbo 850? | |||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 12:41:16pm
I have a 78' 850 and in the future would like to keep the oringinal engine, i have learnt alot from the forums about forced induction and this is the direction i think i will go - BUT
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:09:40pm
There are a few 998 turbos on here, but no 850s that I can recollect.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:12:48pm
thats what im saying we all think there are some out there but cant seem to actually see one runing. lol
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
1137 Posts Member #: 1450 Post Whore Near Paris - France |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:16:17pm
I didn't do it but what I have done is a file to help me calculate outputs and the results have been agreed by knowledgeable people on here.
Rusty by nature
On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:
They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!" |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:16:22pm
The 998 is a longer stroke and larger bore.
Edited by Paul S on 17th Jan, 2010. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:25:33pm
ah yes your right, so if i bored my 850 out to the 998 bore and stuck with 998 pistons it would be 948 - not realy what iwant to do but if you cant get good enough pistons its an option. Cheers paul.
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:32:57pm
Advantage - you make some good points, my main reasons for wanting to go 850 is the facts the engine thats supose to go in my car and not many people have done it. But youu are very right about the cost vs power is never gone go my way.
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
17th Jan, 2010 at 01:53:54pm
Well, if it is your daily drive the you need to think about the logistics of the conversion.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 02:12:46pm
yea that sorted - i meant it WILL be my daily and i currently have a stage 1 1275 in there at the moment :) so i can get it on the road and built an engine then - thats the plan, odds are it will change soon
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
17th Jan, 2010 at 02:17:57pm
depends on your age,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
17th Jan, 2010 at 03:08:11pm
when i changed engines, my insurance came down by 250quid , it went from a 998 stage 1 kit + modded head to a std metro turbo engine up to 125bhp ( age 18-19)
Edited by Brett on 17th Jan, 2010. Yes i moved to the darkside
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 03:27:40pm
Insurance companys are soo stupid, i asume because its a standard engine you put in they think thats its safer or something?? got that wrong, good for youu i suppose 1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
17th Jan, 2010 at 03:52:08pm
On 17th Jan, 2010 richardsoniscool said:
Insurance companys are soo stupid, i asume because its a standard engine you put in they think thats its safer or something?? got that wrong, good for youu i suppose i wast going to argue Yes i moved to the darkside
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
17th Jan, 2010 at 11:18:36pm
true :)
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
18th Jan, 2010 at 11:22:11am
I'm not a believer in doing something just because no-one else has; as a sole reason anyway.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
18th Jan, 2010 at 01:18:47pm
On 18th Jan, 2010 wil_h said:
I'm not a believer in doing something just because no-one else has; as a sole reason anyway. As said above the pistons are the stocking point. But if you can fit 998 pistons then do that. With the head on no-one will know so just say it's an 850, 895cc is pretty colse anyway. Froma turbo point of view I'd be looking at the GT15. I'd say 90bhp at 10psi should be achievable. Wil - your right it is not a great idea to do something just because it hasnt been done, as i say my mini is an 850 so thats what id like to keep it, and i think it would be a nice change because the engine does rev that little bit better. My only concern is the bang for buck, but if you think 90bhp is achievable i think i would be happy with that - i assume thats with a I/C? What car does a GT15 come off of? i was thinking T2 - just because its smaller and more common. It looks like i will have to stick 998 pistons in as i can barly find any 850 pistons!! thanks for you input dude. Mike 1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
18th Jan, 2010 at 01:30:55pm
The GT15 comes in two basic sizes GT1544 and GT1548. Do a search on this forum for more info.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
18th Jan, 2010 at 01:38:38pm
awsome - lots of cars on that list, and quite new also might be able to get a goodun from the scrappy, all seem to be deisel cars, i assume they would be that same as from a petrol car?? i will do some more searching, cheers. 1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
18th Jan, 2010 at 03:14:25pm
Yes lots of cars. The thing to watch out for is the letter following the number. Ihave a feeling that 'V' means it's a VNT which wold be useless. But 'S' is ok as far as I know.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
18th Jan, 2010 at 03:15:57pm
That KKK KP35 off the 1.4TDCi Fez looked like a good selection for an 850.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
18th Jan, 2010 at 06:10:45pm
yes i read somethi9ng about them being a vane type?? i think iv already looked at that thread and it looks a good size. After loking at the list im gona try and get one from a mulitipla or somthing that asnt been ragged - is this good logic?? 1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
Site Admin 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
18th Jan, 2010 at 06:15:08pm
Turbocharging an 850 is all well and good, and certainly possible. But if you spend the same amount of time, effort, money, on a 1275, you will end up with more power at less boost pressure. After all, the reason most people modify engines is to get max power increase for their money. Something to consider anyway.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
16 Posts Member #: 5350 Member Suffolk |
19th Jan, 2010 at 08:26:58am
Good point Tom, but if you use that logic (as smart as it is) why are there so many 998 turbos (this does not include Wil_h and other hill climbers, i know you need the smaller engine to get into the lower class or something :) )?
1978 - 850 - 1275cc MG Spec engine - Turbo build soon.... |
||||||
3329 Posts Member #: 184 Senior Member Melton Mowbray, Pie Country |
19th Jan, 2010 at 09:10:30am
To be honest your reasoning that the car is registered 850 so you wan't to keep it that way works for me. Me and Wil like 998s for all sorts of reasons. we have never modified a 1275 engine so will stick with what we know. http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
|
||||||
453 Posts Member #: 6449 Senior Member Brisbane, Australia |
19th Jan, 2010 at 03:06:50pm
Dont the 850 blocks have cranks like clothes hangers and only have a single cam bearing? Or are these the issues to overcome? In boost we trust |
||||||
Home > 998cc > turbo 850? | |||||||
|
Page: |