Page: |
Home > Show Us Yours! > Exhaust Manifold - Update#4 | |||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Apr, 2007 at 05:13:03pm
Just finished my exhaust manifold design.
Edited by Paul S on 10th Jun, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
174 Posts Member #: 781 Advanced Member Norway |
16th Apr, 2007 at 05:54:28pm
Im not sure, but. Iv heard that stainless stell crack easy so its not good to use whit alot of heat. |
||||||
9812 Posts Member #: 332 Resident Cylinder Head Modifier Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem |
16th Apr, 2007 at 06:01:45pm
TBH stainless is prefered
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Apr, 2007 at 06:50:35pm
321 stainless has the best properties for dealing with high temperatures, but I cant find any weld elbows in 321.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:10:51pm
Can you get 304 elbows? These are what many consider the 'minimum' grade to use for a turbo exhaust manifold.
On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:30:21pm
On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:10pm TurboDave said:
Can you get 304 elbows? These are what many consider the 'minimum' grade to use for a turbo exhaust manifold. The specs I've found for 304 suggest similar heat resistance characteristics to 316. Quote from www.azom.com "Good oxidation resistance in intermittent service to 870°C and in continuous service to 925°C. Continuous use of 316 in the 425-860°C range is not recommended if subsequent aqueous corrosion resistance is important. Grade 316L is more resistant to carbide precipitation and can be used in the above temperature range." So 316L should be OK. This is only for my mild 998 turbo anyway. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
1425 Posts Member #: 690 Post Whore Norfolk |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:35:42pm
Axel - nice piece of cad work there! - just a thought, would it be worth bringing the branches from 1 + 4 up over the top of the inlet tracts to give a more direct feed into the back of the turbine? - I'm not a great fan of exhaust branches pointing at each other - reads backpressure to me? - only a thought
If Carling made Mini engines
|
||||||
11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:38:00pm
http://www.snstainless.com/index.php
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:44:43pm
On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:35pm johnK said:
Axel - nice piece of cad work there! - just a thought, would it be worth bringing the branches from 1 + 4 up over the top of the inlet tracts to give a more direct feed into the back of the turbine? - I'm not a great fan of exhaust branches pointing at each other - reads backpressure to me? - only a thought JK Good point, if you feed two flows together, 180 degrees apart, you are likley to induce vortex formation and high pressure losses. But the injectors are going to be on top of the inlet branches, otherwise I'll have fuel rails sitting on the turbo. I've angled the branches so they are turning into the turbo port. I'm thinking about actually putting a couple of dividing plates in the outlet to guide the flow, much like the standard Metro manifold. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Apr, 2007 at 07:45:21pm
On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:38pm Mini Sprocket said:
http://www.snstainless.com/index.php Thanks, looks like they may do the 321. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
1425 Posts Member #: 690 Post Whore Norfolk |
16th Apr, 2007 at 08:00:38pm
It's never straightforward is it! - flow dividers sound like a good idea. If Carling made Mini engines
|
||||||
485 Posts Member #: 149 Senior Member Alberta, Canada |
16th Apr, 2007 at 08:26:42pm
Alex try Milner Offroad they might do the bends you need.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. |
||||||
6745 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
17th Apr, 2007 at 07:34:31am
you prob know this axel , but make the holes ,for the manifold to bolt to the head , big enough to grow a bit as it gets hot .
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
29th Apr, 2007 at 05:12:20pm
It's starting to come together:
Edited by Paul S on 29th Apr, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
29th Apr, 2007 at 05:14:31pm
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
233 Posts Member #: 863 Senior Member Lathom, lancs |
29th Apr, 2007 at 09:02:55pm
:cool: 8) |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
9th May, 2007 at 05:48:03pm
Done a bit more:
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
9th May, 2007 at 06:41:07pm
I'm thinking no,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
9th May, 2007 at 06:48:52pm
Mini13,
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
9th May, 2007 at 07:09:41pm
I think you need to consider the shape of the turbine you'll be bolting upto it aswell when considering dividers?
Edited by TurboDave16V on 9th May, 2007. On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
9th May, 2007 at 07:18:50pm
On 9th of May, 2007 at 07:09pm TurboDave said:
I think you need to consider the shape of the turbine you'll be bolting upto it aswell when considering dividers? This pic shows the gasses coming out nicely, but actually hitting the side of the turbine for example http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l154/min...Ex20Man20c2.jpg I was thinking that the dividers may keep the pulses separate until the very last moment, but given that it's only 25mm before the flange, then I'm dont think it will matter. The branch centrelines actually converge at the centre of the flange, so flow will be OK. Edited by Paul S on 9th May, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
9th May, 2007 at 07:22:06pm
End of the day - the mirage one does the curly wurly's as proven by nic - this should in theory encourage more pulses from the outer branches into the turbine than the mirage, so it'll probably be cool.
On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
9th May, 2007 at 07:29:35pm
The pipes are quoted as 2.77mm wall thickness. OD is 34mm.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
9th May, 2007 at 07:34:03pm
Yep - same potential argument for why makign the exhaust ports larger than the (factory) manifold tracts is probably going to be of minimal benefit.
Edited by TurboDave16V on 9th May, 2007. On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
9th May, 2007 at 07:34:15pm
Good point on the turbo inlet TD, i was forgetting they come in odd shapes, like you say the mirage one works well, but as i've said before i suspect it would be better if the outer 2 pipes didn't face each other.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
Home > Show Us Yours! > Exhaust Manifold - Update#4 | |||||||
|
Page: |