Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Show Us Yours! > Exhaust Manifold - Update#4

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Just finished my exhaust manifold design.

Based on Sched. 10 316L stainless weld elbows. 1" nominal bore, actually approx. 28mm.

I cant get hold of 321 stainless fittings so have to use 316. The schedule 10 is 2.77mm thick so should be quite strong.

I've had to curve below the inlets as they need to be quite straight to get the two injectors in line.





Now I've just got to order the materials, TIG and Plasma Cutter!

Edited by Paul S on 10th Jun, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Leadfoot

174 Posts
Member #: 781
Advanced Member

Norway

Im not sure, but. Iv heard that stainless stell crack easy so its not good to use whit alot of heat.


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

TBH stainless is prefered






Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

321 stainless has the best properties for dealing with high temperatures, but I cant find any weld elbows in 321.

I can get 321 straight pipe and a tube bender, but the radii would be too big for fitting it all in the tight space.

316 is the next best grade and I can get them easy - about £3 each.

Searching round a lot of the other tuning/welding furums, a lot of people have succesfully used 316, so I think its worth the risk. Maybe on a race car then use 321.

In using the weld elbows at 2.77mm thick, I'm hoping that the additional strength will help the crack resistance.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Can you get 304 elbows? These are what many consider the 'minimum' grade to use for a turbo exhaust manifold.
That said - If you watch the EGT's (especially on the Rolling road) and tig them up with a decent rod, then you will probably be fine.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:10pm TurboDave said:
Can you get 304 elbows? These are what many consider the 'minimum' grade to use for a turbo exhaust manifold.


The specs I've found for 304 suggest similar heat resistance characteristics to 316.

Quote from www.azom.com

"Good oxidation resistance in intermittent service to 870°C and in continuous service to 925°C. Continuous use of 316 in the 425-860°C range is not recommended if subsequent aqueous corrosion resistance is important. Grade 316L is more resistant to carbide precipitation and can be used in the above temperature range."

So 316L should be OK.

This is only for my mild 998 turbo anyway.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

Axel - nice piece of cad work there! - just a thought, would it be worth bringing the branches from 1 + 4 up over the top of the inlet tracts to give a more direct feed into the back of the turbine? - I'm not a great fan of exhaust branches pointing at each other - reads backpressure to me? - only a thought

JK

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

http://www.snstainless.com/index.php

*wink*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:35pm johnK said:
Axel - nice piece of cad work there! - just a thought, would it be worth bringing the branches from 1 + 4 up over the top of the inlet tracts to give a more direct feed into the back of the turbine? - I'm not a great fan of exhaust branches pointing at each other - reads backpressure to me? - only a thought

JK


Good point, if you feed two flows together, 180 degrees apart, you are likley to induce vortex formation and high pressure losses.

But the injectors are going to be on top of the inlet branches, otherwise I'll have fuel rails sitting on the turbo.

I've angled the branches so they are turning into the turbo port. I'm thinking about actually putting a couple of dividing plates in the outlet to guide the flow, much like the standard Metro manifold.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th of Apr, 2007 at 07:38pm Mini Sprocket said:
http://www.snstainless.com/index.php

*wink*


Thanks, looks like they may do the 321.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

It's never straightforward is it! - flow dividers sound like a good idea.

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Doodmeister

485 Posts
Member #: 149
Senior Member

Alberta, Canada

Alex try Milner Offroad they might do the bends you need.

http://www.milneroffroad.com/PIPE.HTM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.


robert

User Avatar

6745 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

you prob know this axel , but make the holes ,for the manifold to bolt to the head , big enough to grow a bit as it gets hot .
looks good
robert

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

It's starting to come together:



Cut and machined the flanges from some 316 stainless, 50 by 10 bar.

Edited by Paul S on 29th Apr, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

*happy*

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



MINIMON

User Avatar

233 Posts
Member #: 863
Senior Member

Lathom, lancs

:cool: 8)


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Done a bit more:



Needs tidying:



Should I put some dividers in there?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

I'm thinking no,

IMO without the dividers the pulses should still be quite divided and will have a good radius to turn into the turbo.

with the dividers i think the turn will be too sharp.

hopefully these shitty pics will show what i mean :$

if there was a more complete/straight path turn into the turbo from the outer cylinders i'd say the dividers would pay off.

this is of course just an opinion*tongue*



On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Mini13,

Thanks, I think you are right.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

I think you need to consider the shape of the turbine you'll be bolting upto it aswell when considering dividers?

This pic shows the gasses coming out nicely, but actually hitting the side of the turbine for example


I think some turbines (T2 certainly) have a big offset- so the lh tube would have a nice flow right into the turbine, the RH one would have a 'sharp turn' about halfway into the turbine housing.

(difficult to explain - look at a housing and you'll see what i mean). If you take a look at the metro manifold, you'll see how BL made the entry pretty straight (easier with a casting than tubes of course)!



Edited by TurboDave16V on 9th May, 2007.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 9th of May, 2007 at 07:09pm TurboDave said:
I think you need to consider the shape of the turbine you'll be bolting upto it aswell when considering dividers?

This pic shows the gasses coming out nicely, but actually hitting the side of the turbine for example
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l154/min...Ex20Man20c2.jpg



I was thinking that the dividers may keep the pulses separate until the very last moment, but given that it's only 25mm before the flange, then I'm dont think it will matter.

The branch centrelines actually converge at the centre of the flange, so flow will be OK.

Edited by Paul S on 9th May, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

End of the day - the mirage one does the curly wurly's as proven by nic - this should in theory encourage more pulses from the outer branches into the turbine than the mirage, so it'll probably be cool.

What is the wall thickness on these btw? 28mm ID sounds perfect!

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The pipes are quoted as 2.77mm wall thickness. OD is 34mm.

To my mind they may be a bit small for high hp but they are the same csa as the 12G295 ports that I'm using.

The turbine needs energy to drive it, by the time the gas hits the wheel the energy has all been converted to velocity. Why slow the gas down in the manifold when the turbo will speed it up again in the volute.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Yep - same potential argument for why makign the exhaust ports larger than the (factory) manifold tracts is probably going to be of minimal benefit.

It's coming together well. Get them outer runners on now :)

I'm hoping to start mine in the next two weeks as I'll be $4K richer on friday (after selling the subaru), and probably $3.5K poorer on saturday after buying a Miller Dynasty DX and a plasma cutter!

Edited by TurboDave16V on 9th May, 2007.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Good point on the turbo inlet TD, i was forgetting they come in odd shapes, like you say the mirage one works well, but as i've said before i suspect it would be better if the outer 2 pipes didn't face each other.

which reminds me, found an interesting site today, check out the flange.

http://www.momentummotorparts.com/store/diy_parts.asp

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/


Home > Show Us Yours! > Exhaust Manifold - Update#4
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 2 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: